SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
RUBINA BANO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMA 54/2018



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc. Application No. 54/2018

1.

Rubina Bano D/o Gulam Khan, Aged About 26 Years, B/c

Muslim, R/o Sipohiyon Ka Mohalla, Des Road, Nagaur,

Presently R/o Dukosi, Tehsil & District Nagaur.

2.

Shoukat Khan S/o Munir Khan, Aged About 26 Years, B/c

Muslim, R/o Dukosi, Tehsil & District Nagaur.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan

2.

Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur

3.

SHO of Nagaur Sadar Police Station, District Nagaur.

4.

Gulab Khan S/o Ahmed Khan,

5.

Insaf Khan S/o Gulab Khan,

6.

Aasif Khan S/o Gulab Khan,

7.

Allanur Khan S/o Gulam Rasul Khan,

8.

Daulat Khan S/o Allanur Khan,

9.

Yusuf Khan S/o Alanur Khan,

No.4 To 9 B/c Muslim, R/o Dukosi, Tehsil & District

Nagaur.

10.

Roshan Kahn S/o Bhanaru Khan,

11.

Barkat Khan S/o Allanur Khan,

No.10 And 11 B/c Muslim, R/o Delhi Darwaja, District

Nagaur.

----Respondents

For Petitioners

:

Mr. Shreekant Verma

For Respondent Nos.1 to 3

:

Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment / Order

29/08/2018

By this criminal misc. application, the petitioners seeks

correction in the order dated 18.08.2018 passed in S.B. Criminal

Misc. Petition No.2547/2018.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMA-54/2018]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the order

dated 18.08.2018, due to typographical error, father name of

petitioner No.1-Rubina Bano typed as “Roshan Khan” instead of

“Gulab Khan”.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this

Court feels that due to inadvertence, the aforementioned mistake

has occurred. Hence, the same is rectified and it is ordered that in

the order dated 18.08.2018 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition

No.2547/2018, in place of “Roshan Khan”, “Gulab Khan” may

be read.

With these observations, this criminal misc. application is

disposed of.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

Abhishek Kumar

S.No.117

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top