SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
PHOOLCHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['FARZAND ALI SYED', '', 'DINESH KUMAR GODARA', 'ABHISHEK PUROHIT', 'PP']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2841/2018

1.

Phoolchand S/o Sh. Mishrimal, Aged About 51 Years, B/c

Ghanchi, aged about 51 years, R/o 15, Satyanarayan

Marg, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Pali (Raj.)

2.

Rajendra Kumar S/o Sh. Mishrimal, By caste Ghanchi,

Aged About 57 Years, R/o 15, Satyanarayan Marg, P.s.

Kotwali, Dist. Pali (Raj.)

3.

Mukesh Kumar S/o Sh. Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 33

Years, B/c Ghanchi, R/o 15, Satyanarayan Marg, P.s.

Kotwali, Dist. Pali (Raj.)

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Gaytri Bhati W/o Ashok Kumar Bhati, R/o 27, Gahnchiyo

Ka Bada Baas, Dist. Pali (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Naman Mohnot.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. VS Rajpurohit, PP

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

17/01/2019

1.

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc.

petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. claiming the following relief :-

“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed

that this Criminal Misc. Petition may kindly be allowed and

the impugned order dated 11.07.2018 passed by Ld.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Communal Violece), Pali

in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top