SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MADAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13285/2018

1.

Madan Singh S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 63 Years,

Village Nagdiya Kheda, Tehsil Gangapur, District Bhilwara.

2.

Udai Ram S/o Chenna Kharol,, Aged About 70 Years,

Village Khandel, Tehsil Railmagra, District Rajsamand

(Raj.).

3.

Mukesh S/o Nanalal Jat,, Aged About 38 Years, Village

Khandel, Tehsil Railmagra, District Rajsamand (Raj.).

4.

Ganesh S/o Aakheram Rao,, Aged About 58 Years, Village

Khandel, Tehsil Railmagra, District Rajsamand (Raj.).

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

Union Of India, Through Ministry Of Road, Transport And

Highway, Government Of India, Through Secretary,

Transport Bhawan- 1 Parliament Street, New Delhi-

11984/21.

2.

The National Highway Authority Of India, Through

Chairman, G-5 And 6, Sector- 10, Dwarka New Delhi.

3.

The Prescribed Authority (Land Acquisition And Additional

District Magistrate), Collectrate- Rajsamand, District

Rajsamand, (Raj.).

4.

Project Director Nhai, Project Implementation Unit, 6-A-1,

R.c. Vyas Colony, Bhilwara 311001.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. S.S. Sisodia

Mr.A.P. Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top