SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJU DEVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 13486/2018



Advocates:
['DEEPAK NEHRA', '', 'MUKTIYAR KHAN', 'PR SINGH AAG']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13486/2018

Raju Devi D/o Shri Kistur Ram And W/of Shri Om Prakash

Kasaniyan, Aged About 25 Years, Village Sathana Khurd, Tehsil

Riyan Badi, Distrit Nagaur (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief

Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan,

Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter,

Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

3.

The Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police

Headquarter, Rajasthan,jaipur (Raj.).

4.

The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Commissionerate,

Jaipur City (Raj.).

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13519/2018

Priyanka Choudhary D/o Shri Miyal Ram Choudhary, Aged About

26 Years, R/o West Side Of The Truck Union, Manasar, District

Nagaur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of

Home, Government Of Home, Department Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director General of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Inspector General of Police (Recruitment), Rajasthan,

Jaipur.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Nagaur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13961/2018

Rekha Saini D/o Shri Narayan Saini, Aged About 27 Years, Ward

No. 25, Near Swami Oil Ke Pass, Fatehpur Shekhawati, District

Sikar (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

(2 of 9)

[CW-13486/2018]

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of

Home, Government Of Home, Department Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director General of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Inspector General of Police (Recruitment), Rajasthan,

Jaipur.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Nagaur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ No. 13962/2018

Renu Chaudhary D/o Shri Sanwara Ram, Aged About 23 Years,

Resident Of Village Sohanpura, Post Barna, Tehsil Degana,

District Nagaur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of

Home, Government Of Home, Department Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Director General of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Inspector General of Police (Recruitment), Rajasthan,

Jaipur.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Nagaur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ No. 14321/2018

Sundar Bai D/o Shri Chatarsal, Aged About 27 Years, Village

Khyali, Post Narwasi, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu (Rajasthan)

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of

Home, Government Of Home, Department Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan Police Headquarters,

Jaipur.

3. Inspector General of Police (Recruitment), Rajasthan Police

Headquarters, Jaipur.

4. Inspector General of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer.

5. Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Deepak Nehra, Dr. Manjula

Choudhary, Mr. Amardeep Lamba, Mr.

Vikas Bijrania.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. P.R. Singh, AAG with Mr. Dinesh

Ojha.

(3 of 9)

[CW-13486/2018]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

REPORTABLE

28/09/2018

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners

seeking directions to the respondents to postpone the Physical

Standard Test / Physical Efficiency Test (‘PST/PET’) for the

petitioners and afford a reasonable time period to them to appear

in and qualifying the PST/PET, post their maternity period

pursuant to the Constable Recruitment-2018 initiated vide

advertisement dated 25.05.2018 and grant them appointment on

the post of Constable (GD), if they find place in the merit list with

all consequential benefits.

The respondents issued an advertisement dated 25.05.2010

(Annex.1) for recruitment to the post of Constable. The candidates

were required to pass three stages i.e. (1)- written examination,

(2)- PST, & (3)- PET. Under the clause pertaining to PET, it was

inter-alia indicated as under :-

efgyk vH;FkhZ tks 'kkjhfjd n{krk ijh{kk ds le; xHkZorh gSa

mudks lykg nh tkrh gS fd og bles

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top