SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
ANIRUD YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 5866/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

(1) S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5866/2022

Anirud Yadav S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 40 Years, 14,

Duamai, Teh. Koli, Dist. Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Gulab Chand S/o Hari Ram, Tausar, Dist. Nagaur (Raj.).

----Respondents

Connected With

(2) S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5867/2022

Imran Khan S/o Abdul Waheed Khan, Aged About 37 Years, B/c

Muslim, R/o 106, Baghrustam, Dist. Farrukhabad (Utter Pradesh)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Gulab Chand S/o Sh. Hari Ram, Tausar, Dist. Nagaur

(Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Gulab Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. S.K.Bhati, PP

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

13/09/2022

1.

The present petitions under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’)

have been filed by the petitioners for quashment of FIR

No.0545/2022, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District

Nagaur vide which allegations under Sections 420 and 406 of the

Indian Penal Code have been levelled against the petitioners.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-5866/2022]

2.

Having regard to the allegations made in the FIR, this Court

deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners to join the

investigation.

3.

The petitioners may file a representation within ten days

before the Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in

accordance with law.

4.

In case the Investigating Officer comes to the conclusion

that a cognizable offence is made out against the petitioners, he

shall issue a notice to the petitioners as required under Section

41-A of the Code.

5.

The criminal misc. petitions so also stay petitions stand

disposed of accordingly.

6.

Needless to observe that the petitioners’ remedy for taking

appropriate action shall stand reserved.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

154-155-akansha/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top