HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
SOHAN LAL SALVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 15289/2021
['NIKHIL JAIN', '', 'NIHAR JAIN', 'RAVI PANWAR', 'VISHAL JANGID', '', 'RAVI PANWAR', 'HEMANT CHOUDHARY']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15289/2021
Sohan Lal Salvi S/o Shri Lalu Ji Salvi, Aged About 58 Years, Dayli
Road, Bandoli, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Pension, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Additional Director, Regional Office, Directorate Of Pension
And Pensioners Welfare, Uaipur.
3.
District Education Officer, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
4.
Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sarada,
Udaipur, Rajasthan.
5.
Smt. Bhawna Gupta W/o Shri Shatrugan Gupta, At Present
Working As Principal Government Senior Secondary School,
Thana, Tehsil Sarada, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Nikhil Dungawat.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Hemant Choudhary.
Mr. Ravi Panwar.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
21/07/2022
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a
direction to the respondents to release the retiral benefits to the
petitioner expeditiously as per Rules alongwith the interest.
During the pendency of the present petition, several
orders/directions were passed by the Court and an additional
affidavit has been filed by the respondents inter-alia indicating as
under:-
“3.
That in this regard, it is respectfully submitted
that the Pension Department has issued PPO
No.1153826, dated 10.09.2021 in favour of the
petitioner, a copy whereof is submitted herewith and
marked as Annex.A/A/1.
4.
That the Pension Department has also made
payment to the petitioner towards gratuity to the
(2 of 4)
[CW-15289/2021]
tune of Rs.14,17,216/- vide GPO No.3234284, dated
10.9.2021, a copy whereof is submitted herewith and
marked as Annex.A/A/2.
5.
That the amount of commutation vide CPO
No.4175753, dated 10.9.2021 for Rs.11,68,893/- has
also been made in favour of the petitioner, a copy
whereof is submitted herewith and marked as
Annex.A/A/3.
6.
That the amount of State Insurance to the tune
of Rs.4,56,285/- has also been paid by the State
Insurance and Provident Fund Department on
16.9.2021 in favour of the petitioner to his SBI A/c
No.51083985286, a copy whereof is submitted
herewith and marked as Annex.A/A/4.
7.
That apart from above, Bill No.165/29.1.2022
for Rs.468368/- towards leave encashment has also
been sent by the School to the Treasury Office for
payment to the petitioner towards 156 P.L. in his
account vide ECS Slip dated 4.2.2022. A copy
whereof is submitted herewith and marked as
Annex.A/A/5. The amount would be credited directly
to the bank account of the petitioner by the Treasury
Office.”
Thereafter, the petitioner has filed additional affidavit giving
out the dates on which he has received the payment.
Today, when the matter came up before the Court, counsel
for the petitioner made submissions that as the respondents have
made the payment to the petitioner with delay, the petitioner is
entitled to payment of interest under Rule 89 of the Rajasthan
Pension Rules, 1996 (‘the Rules of 1996’) and, therefore, the
respondents be directed to make payment of the amount of
interest under the said provisions.
Learned counsel for the parties made submission on the
aspect of petitioner’s entitlement to get interest on the retiral
benefits.
(3 of 4)
[CW-15289/2021]
The provision of Rule 89, in so far as, relevant reads as
under:-
“Rule 89. Interest on delayed payment of retiral
benefits:
(1) If the payment of retiral benefits has been
authorised after 60 days from the date when its
payment became due, and it is established that the
delay in payment was not on account of failure on the
part of the Government Servant in compliance of the
procedure laid down in this chapter or elsewhere in
these rules, interest @ 9% per annum from the date
re