DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
MANSHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLMB/14804/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 25th OF JULY, 2022
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5682 of 2022
Between:-
GURPREET SINGH @ GYANI @ GUDGESH
SINGH S/O AVTAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 28
YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER R/O VILLAGE
PATAVI, TEHSIL NARAYAN, DISTT AMBALA
(HARAYANA) (HARYANA)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI P. S. THAKUR, ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES DISTRICT SATNA
(M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
VICTIM A D/O NOT MENTION NOT MENTION
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI D. K. PAROHA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE )
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
This is first criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, for grant of
bail to the appellant, who is in jail since 21.12.2021 in connection with Crime
No.352/2021, registered at Police Station Civil Lines District Satna (M.P.) for
the offences punishable under Section 376 (i) and 506-II of Indian Penal Code
and Section 3(2)(v) of of SC/ST Act against the order dated 17.6.2022 by
which his application for bail was dismissed.
1
Signed by: ARVIND KUMAR
DUBEY
Signing time: 7/26/2022
11:02:53 AM
Signature Not Verified
(VISHAL DHAGAT)
Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that there is long delay in
lodging of FIR against the appellant. Incident is said to have taken place on
16.4.2021 and FIR has been lodged after period of more than 3 months i.e.
4.7.2021. It is submitted he has been falsely implicated in the case due to
dispute regarding over payment of money of harvesting between appellant and
complainant. In these circumstances, counsel for the appellant made a prayer
for grant of bail to the appellant.
Counsel appearing for the State Government has opposed the appeal for
grant of bail. It is submitted that delay has been explained. Police did not
register FIR as lock down was prevalent at that time. It is further submitted that
appellant belongs to Punjab and if he is released on bail then he may not attend
the trial. In these circumstances, bail application may be dismissed.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
There is long delay of about more than 3 months in lodging of FIR which
throws the doubt of prosecution story. Though, explanation of delay has been
given but same does not appear to be appropriate considering the long delay.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, appeal is
allowed. It is directed that appellant Gurpeet Singh @ Gyani @ Gudgesh
Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty thousand) with two local sureties in the like amount to
the satisfaction of trial Court. The appellant shall abide by the conditions
enumerated in Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.
Certified copy as per rules.
2
Signed by: ARVIND KUMAR
DUBEY
Signing time: 7/26/2022
11:02:53 AM
Signature Not Verified
JUDGE
DUBEY/-
3
Signed by: ARVIND KUMAR
DUBEY
Signing time: 7/26/2022
11:02:53 AM
Signature Not Verified
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.