HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 176/2022

Seliya S/o Shri Samji, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Bhil (S.t.),

Resident Of Suliyamalpada, Tehsil Kushalgarh, District Banswara,

Presently Working As Cook In Govt. Ambedkar Boys Hostel

Kushalgarh, District Banswara.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social Welfare

Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.

3.

The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department,

Banswara.

----Respondents

S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 177/2022

Omprakash Bairwa S/o Shri Dhannalal Bairwa, Aged About 57

Years, B/c Bairwa (S.c.), R/o Gram Sawaiganj, Lahsoda, Tehsil

And District Sawai Madhopur. Presently Working As Chowkidaar

In Govt. Devnarayan Boys Hostel Khandhar, District Sawai

Madhopur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social

Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.

3.

The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department,

Sawai Madhopur.

----Respondents

S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 178/2022

Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Dulichand, Aged About 34 Years, B/c

Meghwal (S.c.), R/o Village Ramtei, Post Rampuriya, Tehsil

Pidawa, District Jhalawar. Presently Working As Chowkidaar

In Govt. Ambedkar Boys Hostel Gangdhar, District Jhalawar.

----Petitioner

Versus

(2 of 2)

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social

Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.

3.

The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department,

Jhalawar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Mahipal Rajpurohit.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

16/12/2022

These review petitions have been filed by the petitioners,

inter alia, with the submissions that the issue now stands covered

by order in Kanhaiya Lal v. State of Raj. & Anr.: SBCW

No.3595/2022

and other connected matters, decided on

01.12.2022.

The orders were passed in the writ petitions prior to

01.12.2022, passing of a subsequent judgment, cannot give a

cause to file the review petitions qua the order already passed, in

view of the proviso to order XLVII, Rule 1 CPC.

Even otherwise, the directions were given to the petitioners

to make a representation. In the representation, the petitioners

can also rely on the order in the case of Kanhaiya Lal (supra) and

it is expected of the respondents to deal with the same

appropriately.

With the above observations, the review petitions stand

disposed of.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

152-PKS/-