Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
HUVA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
CW 15714/2021
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners had taken a loan from the respondent bank and had cleared their entire dues. They filed a writ petition seeking the handover of the possession of the secured assets and related documents.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petitions as having become infructuous since the petitioners had cleared their entire dues.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent bank to handover the possession of the secured assets and related documents to the petitioners within a period of seven days of receiving a certified copy of the order.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15667/2021
Ravi Kalundha S/o Sh. Punjaram Kalundha, Aged About 38
Years, By Caste Kalundha, Resident Of A-143, R.p. Colony,
Jaisalmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Union Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Ceo,
Head Officer, Union Bank Bhavan, 239, Vidhan Bhavan
Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021, Maharashtra,
India
2.
Regional Manager, Regional Officer, Union Of Bank Of
India, Jodhpur
3.
Branch Manager, Union Bank Of India, Jaisalmer Branch,
627, Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Jaisalmer.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15714/2021
Huva Devi W/o Sh. Punjaram Kalundha, Aged About 63 Years, By
Caste Kalundha, Resident Of A-143, R.p. Colony, Jaisalmer
(Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Union Bank Of India, Through Its Chairman Cum Ceo,
Head Officer, Union Bank Bhavan, 239, Vidhan Bhavan
Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021, Maharashtra,
India.
2.
Regional Manager, Regional Officer, Union Bank Of India,
Jodhpur.
3.
Branch Manager, Union Bank Of India, Jaisalmer Branch,
627, Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Jaisalmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Harish Kumar Purohit, through VC
(2 of 2)
[CW-15667/2021]
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
12/01/2022
1.
Mr. Harish Kumar Purohit, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners submits that the petitioners have cleared their entire
dues towards the loan taken from the respondent – Bank and
therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ
petition.
2.
He makes a prayer that the respondent – Bank be directed
to handover the possession of the secured assets of the
petitioners so also the related documents.
3.
The writ petitions are dismissed as having become
infructuous.
4.
In case entire dues have been cleared by the petitioners,
needful be done within a period of seven days of receiving a
certified copy of the order instant.
5.
Needless to observe that if any of petitioners’ grievances still
persists, they will be free to apply for another writ petition.
6.
Stay petitions also stand dismissed accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
32-33-Amar/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
