SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AARFI KHAN @ MUNDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLR 935/2021



(1 of 10)

[CRLR-931/2021]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 931/2021

Aarif Khan @ Munder S/o Sh. Islamo @ Salamudeen Kaaji, Aged

About 24 Years, Ward No. 18, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh,

Rajsthan. (Presently Lodged In Jail, Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 932/2021

Aarif Khan @ Munder S/o Sh. Islamo @ Salamudeen Kaaji, Aged

About 24 Years, Ward No. 18, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh,

Rajsthan. (Presently Lodged In Jail, Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 933/2021

Aarif Khan @ Munder S/o Sh. Islamo @ Salamudeen Kaaji, Aged

About 24 Years, Ward No. 18, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh,

Rajsthan. (Presently Lodged In Jail, Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 934/2021

Aarif Khan @ Munder S/o Sh. Islamo @ Salamudeen Kaaji, Aged

About 24 Years, Ward No. 18, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh,

Rajsthan. (Presently Lodged In Jail, Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 935/2021

Aarif Khan @ Munder S/o Sh. Islamo @ Salamudeen Kaaji, Aged

About 24 Years, Ward No. 18, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh,

Rajsthan. (Presently Lodged In Jail, Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

(2 of 10)

[CRLR-931/2021]

----Respondent

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 936/2021

Aarif Khan @ Munder S/o Sh. Islamo @ Salamudeen Kaaji, Aged

About 24 Years, Ward No. 18, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh,

Rajsthan. (Presently Lodged In Jail, Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Harshad Bhadu for

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sihag

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

28/03/2022

In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its

highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown the order dated

05.05.2018 passed by this Court in Criminal Revision Petition

No.251/2017 Anup Khati @ Kaliya Vs. State of Rajasthan. The said

order dated 05.05.2018 reads as follows:-

“By these criminal misc. petitions, the petitioner-Anup Khati @

Kaliya seeks direction to the effect that the sentences awarded to him by

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.3, Bikaner (for short 'the trial court'

hereinafter) in four cases for the offences punishable under sections 457

and 380 IPC and reduced by learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner (for short

'the appellate court' hereinafter), details of which are being provided in later

part of this order, may be ordered to run concurrently.

The facts necessary for disposal of the present misc.

petition are that the petitioner was tried, convicted and sentenced by the

trial court for the offences punishable under sections 457 and 380 IPC,

details of which are given hereunder:

(3 of 10)

[CRLR-931/2021]

S.

No

Case

No.

Court

Date of

decision

Sentence default Appeal

1.

924/12

ACJM No.

3, Bikaner

01.08.2013

457,380 of IPC 5

years SI Penalty

2000 in default

of penalty of six

months

Session Judge, Bikaner

Appeal No. 148/13

Decision 18.12.13,

Appeallate Court

Sentence 4 years

2.

926/12

ACJM No.

3, Bikaner

3.12.13

457,380 of IPC 5

years SI Penalty

3000 in default

of penalty of six

months

Session Judge, Bikaner

Appeal No. 2/14

Decision 19.06.14,

Appeallate Court

Sentence 4 years

3.

927/12

ACJM No.

3, Bikaner

15.2.14

457,380 of IPC 5

years SI Penalty

3000 in default

of penalty of six

months

Addl. Session Judge,

No. 3 Bikaner Appeal

No. 24/16

Decision 5.5.16,

Appeallate Court

Sentence 3 years 9

months SI

4.

990/12

ACJM No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top