HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
RAMPRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 15948/2021
ANTICIPATORY BAIL - RAJASTHAN EXCISE ACT - SECTION 16/54 - FATHER OF ACCUSED ARRESTED FOR LIQUOR POSSESSION - NO CONNECTION WITH RECOVERY - BAIL GRANTED
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Ramprakash, filed an anticipatory bail application apprehending arrest in connection with an FIR registered under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act. The petitioner's son, Ashok Kumar, was arrested from the spot where liquor was recovered. The petitioner claimed that he had already distributed his property among his sons and was not involved in his son's dealings.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the situation in jails. It found that the petitioner was not directly involved in the recovery of liquor and granted him anticipatory bail.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, who is the father of an accused arrested for liquor possession, can be granted anticipatory bail when he claims to have no connection with the recovery of liquor.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the present case, considering the petitioner's lack of direct involvement in the recovery of liquor and the prevailing COVID-19 situation, it was appropriate to grant him anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the anticipatory bail application and directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15948/2021
Ramprakash S/o Shri Dana Ra, Aged About 56 Years, B/c Jat,
R/o Unchala Bas, Ward No. 11, Ratau, Tehsil Ladnun Police
Station Ladnun District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ramawatar Singh through VC
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
10/01/2022
Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of
the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to
pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.17/2020-2021, Police Station Excise Ladnun, District Nagaur
for the offence under Section 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is
the father of Ashok Kumar who has been arrested from the spot
and from whom the liquor has been recovered. He further submits
that petitioner being unhappy about the dealings of his son, has
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-15948/2021]
already distributed the property in the name of his sons and,
therefore, he is not connected with the recovery of liquor.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.
Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the
case as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic
of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court is of
the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present bail application filed under Sectin
438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest
of petitioner Ramprakash S/o Shri Dana Ra in connection with
F.I.R. No.17/2020-2021, Police Station Excise Ladnun, District
Nagaur, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees:
Fifty Thousand Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of
the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
conditions :-
(I)
that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii)
that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the court.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
85-/Vivek/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.