SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
MANI RAM AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE AND ORS – Respondent
CW 15446/2017



Advocates:
['HEMANT JAIN', '', 'SURYENDRA BERA', 'MAHIPAL SINGH', 'ROHITASH SINGH RATHORE']

(1 of 6)

[CW-15446/2017]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15446/2017

1.

Mani Ram S/o Shri Ramchandraji, B/c Brahmin, R/o

Village Ramsara Jakhdan, Tehsil Suratgarh, District

Sriganganagar.

2.

Mani Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

3.

Rameshwari Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

4.

Tulsi Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

5.

Kamla Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

6.

Nirmala Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

7.

Vidhya Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

8.

Parmeshwari Devi D/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

9.

Omprakash S/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

10.

Santosh S/o Ramchandraji Brahmin,

All Residents Of Village Bherupura @ Seelwana, Tehsil

Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

11.

Guniram S/o Baluramji Brahmin,

12.

Prathviraj S/o Baluramji Brahmin,

13.

Guddi D/o Baluramji Brahmin,

14.

Urma D/o Baluramji Brahmin,

15.

Kashiram S/o Hariramji Brahmin,

16.

Ranjeet S/o Hariramji Brahmin,

17.

Indra D/o Hariramji Brahmin,

18.

Hanso D/o Hariramji Brahmin,

19.

Geeta W/o Vedprakashji Brahmin,

20.

Sudesh S/o Vedprakashji Brahmin,

21.

Sandeep S/o Vedprakashji Brahmin,

22.

Sarita D/o Vedprakashji Brahmin,

23.

Mahaveer S/o Daulatramji Brahmin,

24.

Kamla D/o Daulatramji Brahmin,

25.

Santosh D/o Daulatramji Brahmin,

26.

Gomti D/o Daulatramji Brahmin,

27.

Jyani Devi W/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

28.

Gaurishankar S/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

29.

Mohan Lal S/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

30.

Sharda D/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

31.

Sajna D/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

32.

Pushpa D/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

33.

Manju D/o Rajiramji Brahmin,

(2 of 6)

[CW-15446/2017]

34.

Meera W/o Rameshwar Lalji Brahmin,

35.

Satpal S/o Rameshwar Lalji Brahmin,

36.

Deeparam @ Dalip S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

37.

Shivdutt S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

38.

Pawan Kumar S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

39.

Shayara D/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

40.

Rani D/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

41.

Indra W/o Gordhan S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

42.

Vijay S/o Gordhan S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

43.

Leelawati D/o Gordhan S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

44.

Manju D/o Gordhan S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

45.

Sarita D/o Gordhan S/o Rameshwarlalji Brahmin,

Petitioner No. 11 To 45 Are R/o Village Ramsara Jakhdan,

Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Suratgarh, District

Sriganganagar.

2.

Mandir

Thakurji

Fixed/stayed

Minor,

Through

Manager/president Hanuman S/o Lunaram, B/c Oad, R/o

Chak 13-14 Sgr Lalpura-Oadan, Tehsil Suratgarh, District

Sriganganagar.

3.

Ramchandra S/o Mamraj, B/c Bishnoi,

4.

Jagdish S/o Bhanwarram, B/c Oad,

5.

Harpasl Singh S/o Surjan Singh, B/c Jat, Respondent No.

3 To 5 Are Residents Of 13-14 Sgr, Lalpura-Oadan, Tehsil

Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

6.

Sahabram S/o Brijlal, B/c Brahmin, R/o Sindhuwala,

Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

7.

Prathviram S/o Shri Chetram, B/c Jat, R/o Village

Ramsara

Jakhdan,

Tehsil

Suratgarh,

District

Sriganganagar.

8.

The Learned Board Of Revenue For Rajasthan, Ajmer.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Hemant Jain with

Mr. Ramsukh Mali

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Rohitash Singh Rathore

(3 of 6)

[CW-15446/2017]

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

10/02/2022

1.

In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread

of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

2.

The matter comes up before this Court on an

application (IA No.01/21) under Article 226(3) of the Constitution

of India for vacation of ex-parte interim order dated 29.11.2017

passed by this Court.

3.

However, with the consent of learned counsel for the

parties, the matter has been heard finally.

4.

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition

claiming the following reliefs:

“1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the

impugned order dated 28.07.2017 (Annex.7) passed by

the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top