SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MAHIMAN DYEING COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (RIICO) – Respondent
CW 16301/2018



Advocates:
['RAJESH PARIHAR', 'KESHAV PAREEK', '', 'SANJEET PUROHIT']

(1 of 11)

[CW-14912/2018]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14912/2018

Mahesh Devendra Dyeing, Through Proprietor Shri Mahesh

Chandra Chouhan S/o Shri Bhagwan Das, Aged About 62 Years,

Ward No. 16, Mali Samaj Bhawan Ke Pass, Gandhipura, Balotra,

District Barmer (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment

Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Its Managing

Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

2.

The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial

Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico),

Balotra, District Barmer.

3.

The Divisional Commissioner Cum Allotment Committee,

Jodhpur.

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14908/2018

Mansuri Finishing Works, Through Proprietor Shri Farid Mohd S/o

Shri Haji Kasam Khan, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Ward

No. 2, Khed Road, Near Gogaji Temple, Balotra, District Barmer

(Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment

Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Its Managing

Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

2.

The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial

Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico),

Balotra, District Barmer.

3.

The Divisional Commissioner Cum Allotment Committee,

Jodhpur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16266/2018

Mangal Laxmi Processing, Through Proprietor Shri Shrawan

Kumar S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan, Aged About 53 Years, Resident

Of Opposite Aakdiya Mahadev Temple, Pachpadara Road, Ward

No. 29, Balotra, District Barmer (Raj.)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment

Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Its Managing

Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur

2.

The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial

Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico),

(2 of 11)

[CW-14912/2018]

Balotra, District Barmer

3.

The Divisional Commissioner Cum Allotment Committee,

Jodhpur

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16301/2018

Mahiman Dyeing Company, Through Proprietor Shri Mahendra

Kumar S/o Shri Tulsi Ram Shrimali, Aged About 53 Years,

Resident Of Near Barmer Calendar, Ward No. 1, Balotra, District

Barmer (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment

Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Its Managing

Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

2.

The Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial

Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico),

Balotra, District Barmer.

3.

The Divisional Commissioner Cum Allotment Committee,

Jodhpur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Hemant Kumar Ballani

Mr. Devkinandan Vyas for Mr.Rajesh

Parihar

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sanjeet Purohit

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

13/12/2021

The brief facts, as noticed by this Court, are that the

petitioners are proprietorship firms and they are challenging the

validity and propriety of the decision taken by the Committee

headed by the Divisional Commissioner in its meeting dated

13.05.2017 whereby a decision has been taken to make allotment

of industrial plots to the respective industries on proportionate

basis to the extent the petitioners are having their respective

industrial plots in the municipal area. The petitioners have also

(3 of 11)

[CW-14912/2018]

challenged the demand notice dated 05.09.2018 issued by the

respondents whereby the petitioners were directed to make the

payment for the plots to be allotted at the rate of Rs.1500/- per

square meter (with regard to area of plots size owned by the

respective applicants) as well as Rs.3000/- per square meter for

the extra area being allotted.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that once the

respondents themselves have arrived at a conclusion that the

extra area needs to be allotted for pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top