SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BAPU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 16829/2021



(1 of 2)

[CW-16829/2021]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16829/2021

Bapu S/o Kacharu, Aged About 57 Years, Village Nai Aabadi,

Borwat, Tehsil And District Banswara (Raj.)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Deputy Secretary,

Agriculture (Group-3), Department Of Agriculture,

Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

2.

Maharana Pratap University Of Agriculture And

Technology, Udaipur Through Its Registrar.

3.

Zonal Director (Research) Agricultural Research Station,

Post Box No. 25, Dohad Road, Borwat Farm, Banswara

(Raj.).

4.

Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner Through Its

Registrar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. R.S. Champawat.

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

02/12/2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider

petitioner’s representation (which he would be filing) in light of the

judgment of this Court in the case of Mangi Lal Lohar Vs.

Maharana Pratap University & Ors. (SBCWP No.3924/2014),

decided on 16.1.2017.

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the

petitioner to file representation alongwith a web copy and

photostat copy of the judgment passed by this Court in Mangi Lal

(2 of 2)

[CW-16829/2021]

Lohar (supra) and any other documents which the petitioner will

be filing.

In case, the representation is filed within a period of three

weeks, the competent officer shall consider and decide the same

within a period of 12 weeks of receipt of the representation.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioner’s representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

259-PKS/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top