HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
SMT. SHEETAL SONI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA and ORS – Respondent
CW 9171/2016
['MK TRIVEDI', '', 'CHOUDHARY', 'MANISH TRIVEDI', 'VIPUL SINGHVI', '', 'PAREEK', 'MALI RAM PAREEK', 'ANKIT PRAKASH']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9171 / 2016
Smt. Sheetal Soni W/o Late Shri Sita Ram Soni, Aged About 50 Years,
R/o 549-brahampuri, Bhatiyo Ka Bass, Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India Through Ministry of Labour and Employee Government
of India,, Head Office Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14-bhikaji Kama Place,
New Delhi-110066
2. The Commissioner, Employment Provident Fund Organization Ministry
of Labour and Employee Government of India,, Head Office Bhavishya
Nidhi Bhawan, 14-bhikaji Kama Place, New Delhi-110066
3. The Additional Provident Fund Organization Ministry of Labour and
Employee Government of India,, Head Office Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14-bhikaji Kama Place, New Delhi-110066
4. The Regional Provident Fund Organization Commissioner-II (pension)
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,, Jaipur
5. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (pension) Employee
Provident Fund Organization Regional/sub Regional Office,, Shanker
Nagar Near Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur
6. The State of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary,, Secretariat, Jaipur
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.K. Trivedi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankit Prakash Singh for Mr. Vipul Singhvi
& Mr. M.R. Pareek
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. MOOLCHANDANI
Order
28/03/2017
In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following
prayer :-
“i). That by an appropriate writ, order or directions, the
section 6 of Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Provision Act, 1952 may kindly be ordered to be declared
ultra vires.
(2 of 2)
[CW-9171/2016]
ii)
That by an appropriate writ, order or directions,
the employee pension scheme 1995 may kindly be suitably
amended or rather completely changed and such direction
may kindly be given to the respondent.
iii)
That by an appropriate writ, order or directions,
the pension amount of the petitioner may kindly be given as
per the similar to the provision of Family Pension of State and
Central Government.
iv)
That by an appropriate writ, order or directions,
the representation of the petitioner dated 7-11-
2014(Annexure-7), the pension amount of petitioner may
kindly be increase.
v)
That by an appropriate writ, order or directions,
the petitioner may kindly be awarded 12% interest p.a.
interest from the respondent dated 7-11-2014(Annexure-7).
vi)
That by an appropriate writ, order or directions,
that the above writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be
accepted and allowed with cost.
vii)
That any other order as deemed just and proper
may kindly be passed in favour of petitioner.”
Admittedly, the petitioner is claiming medical
assistance for ailment of cancer suffered to her being wife of
employee working under the control of respondents so also
for enhancement of pension but there is no provision in
rules.
In view of the fact that this Court cannot legislate the
law, in our opinion, in absence of any specific rules, no such
directions can be given to the respondents to grant financial
benefits for the treatment and to enhance the pension.
In view of the above, petitioner may file fresh
representation before the respondents and respondents
shall consider the prayer objectively and decided the
representation within a period of two months from the date
of filing representation.
With these directions, the petition is disposed of.
(G.R. MOOLCHANDANI)J. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS)J.
Sanjaysolanki, pa