HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
DEETA @ DEETRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 16632/2021
['DEEPAK MENARIA', '', 'MOH RASHEED', 'KHUSHBOO VYAS', 'OM PRAKASH GODARA', 'PP']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Third Bail Application No. 16632/2021
Deeta @ Deetraj S/o Vala, Aged About 33 Years, B/c Banaya,
R/o Bada Nala Fala, Police Station Falasiya, District Udaipur.
(At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Khatri (through VC)
for Mr. Deepak Menaria
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
01/02/2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.75/2019 of Police
Station Phalasiya, District Udaipur for the offences punishable
under Sections 448, 366 and 376 IPC. He has preferred this third
bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after
rejection of earlier bail application of the petitioner, the statements
of prosecutrix, her brother-in-law and others have been recorded
before the trial court. It is submitted that from the evidence of the
above witnesses, it is clear that the allegation of sexual assault
against the petitioner is absolutely false because earlier the
husband of the proseuctrix misbehaved with the wife of the
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-16632/2021]
petitioner and in relation to that an FIR was lodged in the year
2019, in which the husband of the prosecutrix was arrested and
later on, released on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has
submitted that from the evidence of the said prosecution witness,
it is clear that the younger brother of the petitioner is having
some land dispute with the husband of the prosecutrix. It is
further submitted that from the above facts and circumstances of
the case, it is clear that the petitioner has falsely been implicated
in this case.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case and taking into consideration the evidence of the
prosecution witnesses recorded so far, without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to
grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this third bail application filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Deeta @
Deetraj S/o Vala shall be released on bail in connection with FIR
No.75/2019 of Police Station Phalasiya, District Udaipur provided
he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two
sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction
of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each
and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till
the completion of the trial.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Abhishek Kumar
S.No.86