SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIRA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['DINESH VISHNOI', '', 'ANAND PRAKASH', 'PP', '', 'DHARMENDRA SURANA']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 10765/2018

Hira Ram S/o Hema Ram Purohit, Aged About 65 Years, Silu

(Sub Jail Sanchore)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dinesh Vishnoi

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. K.V. Vyas, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Order

01/11/2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.50/2018 of Police

Station, Sarwana, District Jalore for the offences punishable under

Sections 341, 323, 307/34, 324 and 326/34 I.P.C. He has

preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that co-

accused persons Nanjiram and Nemaram, against whom allegation

of inflicting injuries have been levelled, have already been

enlarged on bail by this Court and the allegation against the

petitioner is to the effect that he was present along with those co-

accused persons and no specific act has been assigned to the

petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applicatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top