HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
DEVARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLAD 303/2019
['VINEET JAIN', '', 'ASHOK KUMAR PANWAR', 'SURESH KUMBHAT', '', 'ANIKET TATER']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 303/2019
Devaram S/o Sh. Sonaram, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Jat,
Resident Of Jato Ka Doran, Police Station Sadri, Dist. Pali (Raj.)
(Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Appellant
Versus
State, Through PP
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Vineet Jain, Sr. Advocate assisted
by Mr. Ashok Kumar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, PP
Mr. Suresh Kumbhat for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
J U D G M E N T
Judgment pronounced on
:::
20
/05
/2022
Judgment reserved on
:::
11/04/2022
BY THE COURT : (PER HON’BLE MEHTA, J.)
1.
The appellant herein has been convicted and sentenced as
below vide judgment dated 11.10.2019 passed by learned Addl.
Sessions Judge, Bali District Pali in Sessions Case No.47/2012:-
Offence
under
Section
Sentences
Fine
Sentence in lieu of
default of payment
of fine
302 IPC
Life Imprisonment
Rs.15,000/- 6 month’s Additional
Imprisonment
201 IPC
3 Years’ RI.
Rs.5,000/-
3 Months’ Additional
Imprisonment
364 IPC
10 Years’ RI
Rs.10,000/- 5 Months’ Additional
imprisonment
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
(2 of 21)
[CRLAD-303/2019]
2.
He has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2)
Cr.P.C. for assailing the impugned judgment of conviction and the
sentences awarded to him by the trial court.
3.
Briefly stated the facts relevant and essential for disposal of
the instant appeal are noted hereinbelow:-
The deceased Rekha was married to the appellant a year and
half before the incident. She was at her maternal uncle’s house
from where she went missing on 14.09.2012. A Missing Person
Report (Ex.P/9) was lodged by Ghisaram (PW.5), maternal uncle
of the girl at the Police Station Sadri on 15.09.2012. No suspicion
whatsoever was cast on anyone behind the disappearance of
Rekha in this report. The dead body of Rekha was recovered on
17.09.2012 whereafter FIR (Ex.P/6) came to be lodged by Rekha’s
brother Banshilal (PW.4) at the Police Station Sadri alleging inter
alia that Rekha had left her maternal-uncle Ghisaram’s house on
14.09.2012 at 03:15 PM. However, she neither reached the
parental home nor did she report at the matrimonial home upon
which, Shri Ghisaram had lodged a missing person report on
15.09.2012. On 17.09.2012, information was received regarding
dead body of a woman lying in the ‘Barwa Ki Jod’ on which, Shri
Banshilal and his relatives reached the spot and identified the
body to be of Rekha. She had been married to Deva Ram about a
year and half ago. Right after the marriage, marital discord
developed amongst Rekha and her husband as well as with the
matrimonial relatives. His sister was living at the parental home
(3 of 21)
[CRLAD-303/2019]
for the last four months. On 14.09.2012, she had gone to her
maternal-uncle Ghisaram’s home. She received a call on her
mobile phone No. 9636664970 on which, she started to leave
without any information as to where she was going. Noticing this,
Shri Ghisaram inquired and the girl divulged that her husband had
called and she was going to meet him. The informant alleged that
Deva Ram had called Rekha on a false pretext and thereafter he
murdered her. On the basis of this report, FIR No.150/2012 came
to be registered at the Police Station Sadri for the offences under
Sections 364, 302, 201 & 120B IPC and investigation was
commenced. The dead body of Smt. Rekha was subjected to
autopsy
through
a
medical
board
constituted
of
Dr.Devendra Choudhary (PW.31) and Dr. Abhijeet Jain (PW.32).
The autopsy was carried out and the Medical Board issued
postmortem report (Ex.P/38) opining that the cause of death of
Smt. Rekha was strangulation.
4.
The accused appellant was arrested. Acting in furtherance of
the information provided by the accused (Ex.P/48), the IO claims
to have effected recove