SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
RAMESHWAR VYAS
RAHUL @ HULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/17156/2021



(1 of 2)

[CRLMB-17156/2021]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 17156/2021

Rahul @ Hulla S/o Kasam Mev, aged about 22 years, R/o Dahar

Khoh, P.S. Khoh, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur.

(At present confined in District Jail, Hanumangarh).

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. J.K. Moolchandani through VC

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mohd. Javed Gouri, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS

Order

28/01/2022

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in

connection with F.I.R. No. 266/2021 registered at Police Station

Goluwala, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections

417, 419, 384, 385, 388, 389 & 506 of I.P.C. and Sections 66D,

66E, 67 & 67A of IT Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video

conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material

available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

investigation in the matter has been completed. The offences

alleged against the petitioner under Sections 417, 419, 384, 385,

388, 389 & 506 of I.P.C. and Sections 66D, 66E, 67 & 67A of IT

Act are triable by the Magistrate and except Section 384 of I.P.C.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-17156/2021]

and Section 67A of IT Act, all offences are bailable one. He

further submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the

petitioner. The false allegations have been levelled against the

petitioner. The petitioner is behind the bar since last about two

months. The trial of the case may take sufficient time to

complete. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

the bail application.

Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and

upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case,

without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of

the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

Consequently, the present bail application under Section 439

of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner -

Rahul @ Hulla S/o Kasam Mev arrested in connection with

F.I.R. No. 266/2021 registered at Police Station Goluwala, District

Hanumangarh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a

personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with

the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing

and as and when called upon to do so.

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J

22-Inder/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top