HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
DHARM DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 17121/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17121/2022
Dharm Das S/o Jagdish Das, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste
Swami, Resident Of Village Changoi, Gram Panchayat Mikhala,
Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
The District Collector (Land Record), Churu.
3.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Taranagar, District Churu.
4.
The Tehsildar (Land Record), Taranagar, Churu.
5.
The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mikhala, Panchayat
Samiti Taranagar, District Churu.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Moti Singh.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
17/11/2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The present writ petition has been filed with the following
prayers:-
“It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition
may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ,
order or direction:-
(i) That the notice dated 19.09.2022 (Annexure-1)
may kindly be quashed and set aside.
(ii) That the respondents may kindly be restrained to
remove the house and possession of the petitioner
upon the plot in question of Khasra No.1119/264
(2 of 3)
[CW-17121/2022]
Village Changoi, Gram Panchayat Mikhala, Tehsil
Taranagar, District Churu.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance
of the notice issued on 19.09.2022, the respondent authorities are
proceeding against the petitioner in a hot-haste manner without
considering the reply filed by him. Learned counsel for the
petitioner further submits that the concerned authorities may be
directed to act in accordance with the provisions of law.
This Court has considered the submissions made at the Bar
and has also gone through the pleadings made in the petition.
The respondent authorities have issued a notice under
Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 dated
19.09.2022 and Section 22 of the Colonization Act, 1954, the
petitioner has filed reply to the said notice and the matter is
pending consideration before the concerned Authority. There is no
occasion for this Court to assume that the authorities concerned
will not act in accordance with law. The contentions of the learned
counsel for the petitioner that the authorities are proceedings in
hot-haste manner is also not reflected from the papers placed
before this Court. However, in the interest of justice, the
respondent authorities are directed to proceed in the matter in
accordance with law and any action taken by them must be in-
conformity with law and in due compliance of the principles of
natural justice.
The respondent authorities shall pass the order in the
proceedings pending before it strictly in accordance with law.
Till the final decision is taken by the concerned Authority, the
petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the subject piece of land.
(3 of 3)
[CW-17121/2022]
The writ petitions is disposed of in the above terms. All
pending applications also stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
230-/Jitender//-