HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
NASARIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 7624/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7624/2022
1.
Nasarin D/o Rifakat Husain W/o Mohd Aasiqu, Aged About
20 Years, R/o Churai Bareilly U.p. At Presently Residing At
Boranada Jodhpur
2.
Mohd Aasiqu S/o Khaleel Ahamed, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Barely Shishgarh U.p. Presently Residing At Boranada
Jodhpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Deptt. Of
Home Affairs Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur
2.
Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur
3.
S.h.o., Ps Boranada Dist. Jodhpur
4.
Rifakat Husain S/o Jmanat Husain, Aged About 50 Years,
R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
5.
Jamanant Husain S/o Abdul Husain, Aged About 84 Years,
R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
6.
Firasat Husain S/o Rifakat Husain, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
7.
Riyasat Husain S/o Rifakat Husain, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
8.
Nasir S/o Rifakta Husain, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Churai Bareilly U.p.
9.
Jameel S/o Jamanat Husain, Aged About 40 Years, R/o
Churai Bareilly U.p.
10.
Sabdar Husain S/o Jamanat Husain, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
11.
Aamir Husain S/o Jamanat Husain, Aged About 40 Years,
R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
12.
Jakir Husain S/o Jamil Husain, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Churai Bareilly U.p.
13.
Jahir Riyasat Husain S/o Jamil Husain, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Churai Bareilly U.p.
14.
Tahir Husain S/o Aamir Husain, Aged About 21 Years, R/o
Churai Bareilly U.p.
----Respondents
(2 of 3)
[CRLMP-7624/2022]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Bidan Halu
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/11/2022
The petitioners have preferred this petition under Section
482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official
respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the
petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life
and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of
the Constitution of India provides for right to life, limb and
personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any
threat to the same amounts to violation of rights guaranteed by
the Constitution of India. Being the citizen of independent India,
the petitioners have right to reside with honour and dignity,
therefore, they have sought protection from the hands of private
respondents and also sought directions to respondents to provide
them adequate protection.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as
perusing the record of the case, since the petitioners apprehend
threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court is of the
considered view that the petitioners have every right to seek the
protection of their life, limb and liberty; and therefore, persuaded
to dispose of the present petition with the direction to the
petitioners to appear before the Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur
along with appropriate representation regarding their grievance.
(3 of 3)
[CRLMP-7624/2022]
The Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur shall in turn hear the
grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat
perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide
adequate security and protection to the petitioners.
It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not
affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the
petitioners.
(FARJAND ALI),J
235-Anshul/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.