SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
LEELA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLW 456/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 456/2022

1.

Leela D/o Shankra Ram, Aged About 27 Years, W/o

Kumbha Ram, R/o Village Gulasar, Birloka, Tehsil

Khinvsar, District Nagour.

2.

Kumbha Ram S/o Ishar Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o

Chak 16P, Tehsil Anopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department

Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

Superintendent Of Police, Sriganganagar.

3.

Sho Of Anopgarh, Police Station, District Sri Ganganagar.

4.

Sho Of Khinvsar, Police Station, District Nagour.

5.

Raju S/o Shankra Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o

Gulasar, Birloka, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagour.

6.

Shankra Ram S/o Bhura Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o

Gulasar, Birloka, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagour.

7.

Ramesh S/o Shankra Ram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o

Gulasar, Birloka, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagour.

8.

Pukhraj S/o Chhotulal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village

Virsalu, District Jodhpur.

9.

Jeetu S/o Chhotulal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village

Virsalu, District Jodhpur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Ms. Mamta Kandra

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

29/11/2022

1.

The petitioners have preferred this criminal writ petition

for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to

(2 of 2)

[CRLW-456/2022]

provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the

ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the

hands of private respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article

21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and

personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any

threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

3.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as

perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present

petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the

Station House Officer, Police Station Anoopgarh, District

Sriganganagar alongwith appropriate representation regarding

their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station

Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar shall in turn hear the grievance

of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if

necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate

security and protection to the petitioners.

4.

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall

not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the

petitioners.

5.

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

338-Sudheer/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top