HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
SAFI MOHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLMP 6670/2019
['PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA', '', 'RAHUL RAJPUROHIT', 'SACHIN ACHARYA', 'PP', 'JEETENDER SINGH KHICHI']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6670/2019
1.
Safi Mohammed S/o Kamarudeen, Aged About 60 Years,
By Caste Musalman, R/o Ward No. 8, Nawan, Police
Station Hanumangarh Junction.
2.
Haneefa Biwi W/o Sh. Safi Mohammed, Aged About 55
Years, By Caste Musalman, R/o Ward No. 8, Nawan, Police
Station Hanumangarh Junction.
3.
Akeel Mohammed S/o Safi Mohammed, Aged About 33
Years, By Caste Musalman, R/o Ward No. 8, Nawan, Police
Station Hanumangarh Junction.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State, Through P.p.
2.
Seema W/o Akeel Mo. D/o Sabir Khan, By Caste
Musalman, R/o New Civil Lines, Hanumangarh (Jun),
District Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6775/2019
1.
Wali Mohd. S/o Safi Mohd., Aged About 35 Years, By
Caste Muslim, Resident Of Ward No. 8, Tehsil Nava,
District Hanumangarh.
2.
Seema W/o Wali Mohd., Aged About 30 Years, By Caste
Muslim, Resident Of Ward No. 8, Tehsil Nava, District
Hanumangarh.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State, Through Pp
2.
Seema W/o Akeel D/o Sabir Ali, B/c Muslim, Resident Of
Hanumangarh Junction.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Dr. Sachin Acharya, Sr. Adv. assisted
by Mr. Rahul Rajpurohit.
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP.
Mr. Jeetender Singh Khichi.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
Reserved on 23/08/2022
Pronounced on 25/08/2022
(2 of 5)
[CRLMP-6670/2019]
1.
These criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have
been preferred claiming the following reliefs: -
6670/2019:
“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed, that
this petition of the petitioner may very kindly be allowed, and
Order Dated 27.11. 2019 Passed By Learned ADJ No.2
Hanumangarh, In Criminal Revision No. 188/2019, And Order
Dated 26.08.2019 Passed By Learned Judicial Magistrate
Hanumangarh In Criminal Case No. 197/2018 (C.I.S
No.2876/2018), may be quashed and set aside”.
6775/2019 :
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed on behalf of
petitioner that the Cr. Misc. petition may kindly be allowed
and the impugned order dated 27.11.2019 passed by
Additional District & Session Judge No.2, Hanumangarh in
criminal revision case no 188/2019 where by the affirmed that
order dated 26.8.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate,
Hanumangarh in criminal case no 197/2018 of framing
charges against the petitioners for offence u/s 498a & 323 IPC
may kindly be set aside”.
2.
Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by the
learned counsel for the petitioners, are that on 19.01.2018
complainant/respondent no.2 submitted a report before the Mahila
Thana Hanumangarh, against the petitioners and others. It was
alleged her marriage with the petitioner no.3-Akeel was
solemnized on 16.08.2009, and that her parents gave sufficient
dowry to petitioners. It was further alleged that the petitioners
were not happy with the dowry articles given by her parents at the
time
of
marriage.
On
demand
of
dowry
the
complainant/respondent no.2 is subjected to the physical and
mental cruelty by the petitioners. The complainant/respondent
no.2 further alleged that petitioner no.2-Haneefa during her
(3 of 5)
[CRLMP-6670/2019]
(complainant’s) pregnancy pressurized her to perform grinding the
wheat, due which her tube was damaged and her pregnancy was
terminated.
2.1
However, she blessed with a daughter Heena on 16.11.2011
and her parents gifted some gold and cash amount to the
petitioners, but the petitioners not happy with the gift items and
birth of the child. The complainant gave birth to another daughter
Jasmin in year of 2014. The petitioner no.3 - Akeel however,
performed re-marriage with one Mafia. She further stated that the
petitioners continued to demand the dowry and was subjected to
harassment and cruelty by the