SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MANA RAM DANGA @ MEH RAM DANGA – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
CRLAS 2013/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2013/2022

Mana Ram Danga @ Meh Ram Danga S/o Jassa Ram Danga,

Aged About 36 Years, B/c Jat R/o Vill. Dangawas Tehsil Merta

Dist. Nagaur (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Merta City Dist.

Nagaur)

----Appellant

Versus

1.

The Union Of India, Through C.b.i. (Special P.p.)

2.

Arjun Ram S/o Ratna Ram, R/o Meghwalo Ka Mohalla

Dangawas Tehsil Merta Dist. Nagaur

3.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. G.R. Punia Sr. Adv assisted by Mr.

Rajesh Punia

For Respondent(s)

:

Dr. Sachin Acharya, Sr. Adv assisted

by Mr. Rahul Rajpurohit, Spl. PP for

CBI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

06/12/2022

The present criminal appeal for interim bail has been filed by

the appellant under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act 1989, on the ground of marriage of his cousin sister

and brother on 07.12.2022 and 08.12.2022 respectively.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant’s

cousin sister and brother marriage has been fixed on 07.12.2022

and 08.12.2022 respectively and presence of appellant is very

much essential. In these circumstances, the appellant may be

granted interim bail for a period of 15 days.

(2 of 2)

[CRLAS-2013/2022]

Dr. Sachin Acharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing for

C.B.I. and learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the prayer of

the appellant, since allegation against the appellant is for offence

under Section 302 of IPC.

I have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the CBI. Perused

the material available on record.

Considering the facts that the allegation against the

appellant is of committing murder of five persons and uncle whose

children’s marriage is going to be solemnized, is not real uncle of

the present appellant and there are other family members

available in the family of the appellant to attend the marriage, this

Court is not inclined to grant interim bail to the appellant.

Hence, the criminal appeal for interim bail is dismissed.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

165-raksha/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top