HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MANA RAM DANGA @ MEH RAM DANGA – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
CRLAS 2013/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2013/2022
Mana Ram Danga @ Meh Ram Danga S/o Jassa Ram Danga,
Aged About 36 Years, B/c Jat R/o Vill. Dangawas Tehsil Merta
Dist. Nagaur (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Merta City Dist.
Nagaur)
----Appellant
Versus
1.
The Union Of India, Through C.b.i. (Special P.p.)
2.
Arjun Ram S/o Ratna Ram, R/o Meghwalo Ka Mohalla
Dangawas Tehsil Merta Dist. Nagaur
3.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. G.R. Punia Sr. Adv assisted by Mr.
Rajesh Punia
For Respondent(s)
:
Dr. Sachin Acharya, Sr. Adv assisted
by Mr. Rahul Rajpurohit, Spl. PP for
CBI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
06/12/2022
The present criminal appeal for interim bail has been filed by
the appellant under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act 1989, on the ground of marriage of his cousin sister
and brother on 07.12.2022 and 08.12.2022 respectively.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant’s
cousin sister and brother marriage has been fixed on 07.12.2022
and 08.12.2022 respectively and presence of appellant is very
much essential. In these circumstances, the appellant may be
granted interim bail for a period of 15 days.
(2 of 2)
[CRLAS-2013/2022]
Dr. Sachin Acharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing for
C.B.I. and learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the prayer of
the appellant, since allegation against the appellant is for offence
under Section 302 of IPC.
I have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as
learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the CBI. Perused
the material available on record.
Considering the facts that the allegation against the
appellant is of committing murder of five persons and uncle whose
children’s marriage is going to be solemnized, is not real uncle of
the present appellant and there are other family members
available in the family of the appellant to attend the marriage, this
Court is not inclined to grant interim bail to the appellant.
Hence, the criminal appeal for interim bail is dismissed.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
165-raksha/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.