SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SURAJ DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SMT VEENU GUPTA AND ORS – Respondent
CCP 569/2018



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT

JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.569/2018

Suraj Devi W/o Late Shri Devi Shankar Bhatia, Aged About 68

Years, R/o Mohalla Neemdi Pada Anta Ward No.10, District Baran

Rajasthan

----Petitioner

Versus

1. Smt. Veenu Gupta Principal Secretary Medical and Health

Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur Raj

2. Shri V.K. Mathur Director of Medical and Health and Family

Welfare Services, Govt. of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak

Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur Raj

3. Shri Rakesh Sharma Additional Director (administration),

Medical and Health and Family Welfare Services, Govt of

Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur Raj

4. State of Rajasthan Through the Principal Secretary, Medical

Health and Family Welfare Department Government of Rajasthan,

Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan

----Respondents

_____________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr.Narendra Mishra

For Respondent(s) :

Mr.Avinash Sharma for Mr.Shyam Arya, AAG

_____________________________________________________

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA

Order

14/05/2018

Mr.Narendra Mishra appearing for the petitioner

submitted that in compliance with the order dated 9.8.2017

passed in SBCWP No.12504/2016 filed at the petitioner’s instance,

the requisite order has been passed on 24.1.2018 under the hand

of Additional Director (Administration), Medical and Health and

Family Welfare Services, Govt of Rajasthan. He however submitted

that in the said order the petitioner’s husband name reflected

(2 of 2)

[CCP-569/2018]

erroneously is ‘Late Shri Devishankar Sharma’ while ought to have

been ‘Late Shri Devishankar Bhatia’.

Mr.Avinash Sharma appears for Mr.Shyam Arya, AAG

submits that the necessary rectification in order dated 24.1.2018

in the name of the petitioner’s late husband as warranted by the

record with the Department will be made within a period of two

weeks and that payment due to the petitioner will also be made

within a period of three months thereafter.

In view of the submissions of Mr.Avinash Sharma, this

contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.

The respondents are however directed to make the

necessary rectification in the order dated 24.1.2018 with regard to

the petitioner’s late husband name as recorded hereinabove within

two weeks and pay the due amounts consequent to the order

dated 24.1.2018 within a period of three months thereafter.

(ALOK SHARMA), J

Himanshu/41

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top