HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SURAJ DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SMT VEENU GUPTA AND ORS – Respondent
CCP 569/2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.569/2018
Suraj Devi W/o Late Shri Devi Shankar Bhatia, Aged About 68
Years, R/o Mohalla Neemdi Pada Anta Ward No.10, District Baran
Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Smt. Veenu Gupta Principal Secretary Medical and Health
Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur Raj
2. Shri V.K. Mathur Director of Medical and Health and Family
Welfare Services, Govt. of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak
Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur Raj
3. Shri Rakesh Sharma Additional Director (administration),
Medical and Health and Family Welfare Services, Govt of
Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur Raj
4. State of Rajasthan Through the Principal Secretary, Medical
Health and Family Welfare Department Government of Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr.Narendra Mishra
For Respondent(s) :
Mr.Avinash Sharma for Mr.Shyam Arya, AAG
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order
14/05/2018
Mr.Narendra Mishra appearing for the petitioner
submitted that in compliance with the order dated 9.8.2017
passed in SBCWP No.12504/2016 filed at the petitioner’s instance,
the requisite order has been passed on 24.1.2018 under the hand
of Additional Director (Administration), Medical and Health and
Family Welfare Services, Govt of Rajasthan. He however submitted
that in the said order the petitioner’s husband name reflected
(2 of 2)
[CCP-569/2018]
erroneously is ‘Late Shri Devishankar Sharma’ while ought to have
been ‘Late Shri Devishankar Bhatia’.
Mr.Avinash Sharma appears for Mr.Shyam Arya, AAG
submits that the necessary rectification in order dated 24.1.2018
in the name of the petitioner’s late husband as warranted by the
record with the Department will be made within a period of two
weeks and that payment due to the petitioner will also be made
within a period of three months thereafter.
In view of the submissions of Mr.Avinash Sharma, this
contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
The respondents are however directed to make the
necessary rectification in the order dated 24.1.2018 with regard to
the petitioner’s late husband name as recorded hereinabove within
two weeks and pay the due amounts consequent to the order
dated 24.1.2018 within a period of three months thereafter.
(ALOK SHARMA), J
Himanshu/41