HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 712/2021

1.

Arman S/o Shri Sarafat, Aged About 20 Years, Resident

Of Changwaria Pada, Badi, Police Station Badi, District

Dholpur (Raj) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur)

2.

Farman S/o Shri Sarafat, Aged About 18 Years, Resident

Of Changwaria Pada, Badi, Police Station Badi, District

Dholpur (Raj) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur)

3.

Imran S/o Shri Pappu @ Matela, Aged About 19 Years,

Resident Of Changwaria Pada, Badi, Police Station Badi,

District Dholpur (Raj) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur)

4.

Shakir S/o Shri Anjar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of

Changwaria Pada, Badi, Police Station Badi, District

Dholpur (Raj) (At Present In District Jail, Dholpur)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Anil Jain on behalf of Mr. Dushyant

Jain

For Respondent(s)

For Complainant(s)

:

:

Mr. S.K. Mahla, PP

Mr. Jitendra Pandey

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

28/01/2021

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

No.175/2020 registered at Police Station Badi, District Dholpur for

the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452, 336, 504 of

IPC, later on converted under Section 341, 323, 307, 34 of IPC.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-712/2021]

2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have

been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that

petitioners and complainant have settled their dispute by way of

compromise. Counsel further submits that the petitioners are

behind the bars since 03.01.2021.

3. Counsel for the complainant-Mr. Jitendra Pandey has admitted

the fact of compromise between the parties.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the

complainant has opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the material on record and taking into account the

facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the

period of custody and without expressing any opinion on the

merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioners be admitted

to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is

directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court

through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

CHARU SONI /41