SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
RAVI BANJARA S/O SHRI MADAN LAL BANJARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 829/2021



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 829/2021

Ravi Banjara S/o Shri Madan Lal Banjara, Aged About 26 Years,

R/o Lawa Ka Bas Ps Thanagazi Dist. Alwar Raj. (Presently

Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 830/2021

Mangi Lal Banjara S/o Late Shri Ranjeet Banjara, Behind Bijli

Grade Jambaramgrah Ps Jambaramgrah Dist. Jaipur Gramin (At

Present Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Deepak Meena

Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Yashwant Kan Khadia, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

20/01/2021

1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

No. 144/2020 registered at Police Station Andhi, District Jaipur

(Rural) for the offence(s) under Section 379 of IPC (In FIR) and

under Sections 379, 34 of IPC (In Order).

2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have

been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-829/2021]

co-accused Yogesh @ Nanu has already been released on bail by

the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.10.2020

passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

12484/2020. Counsel further submits that the case of petitioners

is similar to that of co-accused Yogesh @ Nanu. Counsel further

submits that the case is triable by the Magistrate. Counsel further

submits that challan has already been presented in the Court and

conclusion of trial may take long time.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications.

4. Considering the material on record and taking into account the

facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact

that co-accused Yogesh @ Nanu has already been released on bail

and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case,

these petitions are allowed. Petitioners be admitted to regular bail

subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is directed to send

a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-

mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

CHARU SONI /87-88

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top