SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
VEENITA MEENA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MEMBER J D A A TRIBUNAL AND ORS – Respondent


(1) DB CIVIL SPL. APPEAL(W) 1365/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

JUDGMENT

D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL(WRIT) NO.1365/2012

IN

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.17001/2011

VEENITA MEENA & ANR.

Vs.

MEMBER J.D.A. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR & ORS.

DATE:08.11.2012

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN MISHRA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I

Mr. Dileep Sinsinwar, for the appellants.

****

BY THE COURT:(PER HON'BLE JAIN, J.)

There is delay of 30 days in filing the intra-Court

appeal.

2.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, duly

supported by an affidavit, delay in filing the appeal is

condoned. Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act

stands allowed.

3.

Heard learned counsel for appellants on admission

of the appeal.

4.

Appellants-petitioners have preferred this intra-

Court appeal challenging the impugned order of the Single

Bench dated 20.07.2012, whereby writ petition, filed by

appellants-petitioners, has been dismissed.

5.

Briefly stated the facts of the case are that

appellants were allotted Plot Nos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top