SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VED RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
MUNSHIRAM AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MOHIT GUPTA', 'S K GUPTA', '', 'SANJAY YADAV']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1186/2012

Ved Rathor S/o Shri Hari Kishan Rathore b/c Sanu Rathore R/o

Delhi road, Mungaska Tehsil & District Alwar.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. Munshiram S/o Khyali Ram Jatav R/o Khurdanpuri Tehsile &

District Alwar.

2. Laxman S/o Kishan Lal Jatav R/o Khurdanpuri Alar Presently

Residing at Village chototi Ishtmurai, Tehsile Ramgarh District

Alwar.

3. Naresh Yadav S/o Tandiram Yadav R/o Phoji Colony, 200 foot

Road, Alwar.

4. Ramesh Yadav S/o Girarj Prasad Yadav R/o Ramnagar colony,

200 foot Road Alwar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr.Mohit Gupta

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr.Sanjay Yadav

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA

Order

02/11/2018

The respondents No.1—Munshiram and No.2- Laxman

pursuant to the bailable warrant issued under the Court’s order

dated 5.10.2018 are present in Court.

Mr.Sanjay Yadav appears for the respondents-

defendants (hereafter ‘defendants’).

The case of the petitioner- plaintiff (hereafter ‘plaintiff’)

in this contempt petition is the alleged breach of the Court’s status

(2 of 4)

[CCP-1186/2012]

quo order dated 23.7.2008 passed in SBCWP No.5801/2008 title

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top