HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 931/2022

Jhutharam Son Of Shri Govindram, Resident Of Village

Charanwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

2.

Radharani Build Estate Private Limited, Office C-68, Lal

Kothi Scheme, Tonk Road Jaipur Through Its Authorised

Signatory Anil Kumar Jain Son Of Shri Swaroop Jain

Office At 816-A, Gururamdas Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur

(Raj).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dheeraj Singhal (through VC)

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP.

Mr. Abhi Goyal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

19/04/2022

IA No.1/2022:

Matter comes up on an application under Section 482 of

Cr.P.C. for taking on record the compromise dated 24.02.2022.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is

allowed.

Compromise taken between the parties is taken on record.

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 931/2022:

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the

petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR

No.886/2020 registered at Police Station Muhana, Jaipur City

(South) for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and

120B of IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-931/2022]

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

counsel for the complainant-respondent submitted that

compromise has been arrived between the parties and they have

settled their dispute. So, criminal proceedings pending between

them, be set aside.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments

advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the complainants acknowledging the

factum of compromise between the parties and submitted that

they have no objection if the FIR in question and consequential

criminal proceedings are quashed.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the

record.

A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute

between the parties has amicably been settled by them. In view of

compromise and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court of

India in cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10

SCC 303, Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC

466 and Manoj Agarwal & Anr. Vs. The State of Uttar

Pradesh & Anr. decided on 04.03.2022 by the Hon’ble Supreme

Court, this Court deems it just and proper to quash the FIR in

question and consequential criminal proceedings.

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.

The FIR No.886/2020 registered at Police Station Muhana, Jaipur

City (South) for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471

and 120B of IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby

quashed and set aside, qua petitioner.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Seema/32