SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
GIRIRAJ PRASAD VIJAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJ and ORS – Respondent


CW 6399/06

//1//

In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan

Jaipur Bench

**

Civil Writ Petition No.6399/2006

Girraj Prasad Vijay Versus State & Ors.

Date of Order ::: 10/02/09

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

Mr. Banwari Sharma, for petitioner

Mr. BK Sharma for respondent No.2 & 3

Mr. Chetan Bairwa, Addl. Govt. Counsel, for respondents.

Instant petition has been filed by

petitioner with the grievance that on account of

audit objection communicated vide order dt.

09/03/07 (Ann.3), all of his retiral dues, which

otherwise became due and payable under Rules, were

arbitrarily withheld by respondents.

Petitioner initially joined service on

01/03/77 as Naka Guard in Municipal Board, Rajgarh

(Alwar) and upon abolition of post of Naka Guard,

stood absorbed in the cadre of Class IV and

retired from service on 30/04/2007. While in

service, he was served with a letter dt.09/03/07

(Ann.3) alongwith audit objection pointing out

that while his fixation was made under Revised Pay

Scale Rules, he was entitled to get benefit of

fixation on 0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top