HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
FARJAND ALI
SHREYA PAREEK D/O SHRI VINOD PAREEK W/O SHRI SONU PAREEK, – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP/787/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 787/2022
1.
Shreya Pareek D/o Shri Vinod Pareek W/o Shri Sonu
Pareek, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Bamoritalli
Bandobasti,haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, At Present
R/o Village Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
2.
Sonu Pareek S/o Madan Lal Pareek, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o Village Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home Affairs, And Justice, Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Superintendent Of Police Station, Alwar
3.
Station House Officer, Police Station Bansur, District
Alwar.
4.
Shri Vinod Pareek S/o Shri Prakash Chand Pareek, R/o
Bamoritalli Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.
5.
Radha Pareek W/o Vinod Pareek, R/o Bamoritalli
Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.
6.
Jitendra Pareek S/o Shri Prakash Chand Pareek, R/o
Bamoritalli Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.
7.
Vimla Pareek W/o Jitendra Pareek, R/o Bamoritalli
Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.
8.
Mahinder Sharma S/o Jagn Nath Sharma, R/o Adarsh
Colony, Near Balaji Mandir, Rudrapur, Tehsilkichha, District
Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.
9.
Babita W/o Mahinder Sharma, R/o Adarsh Colony, Near
Balaji Mandir, Rudrapur, Tehsilkichha, District Udham
Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.
10.
Madan Lal Pareek S/o Shri Ganga Sahay Pareek, R/o
Village Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan
11.
Sumitra Devi W/o Madan Lal Pareek, R/o Village Khohari,
Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan
----Respondents
(2 of 3)
[CRLMP-787/2022]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid, Adv., through
VC
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. F. R. Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
24/01/2022
The petitioners have preferred this petition for issuance of
necessary directions to the official respondents to provide
adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground
that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of
private respondent Nos.4 to 11.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of
the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal
liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to
the same amounts to violation of the same.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as
perusing the record of the case, since the petitioners apprehend
threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court disposes of the
present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear
before the Superintendent of Police, Alwar along with appropriate
representation regarding their grievance. The Superintendent of
Police, Alwar shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners,
and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may
pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection
to the petitioners.
(3 of 3)
[CRLMP-787/2022]
It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not
affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the
petitioners.
Stay petition also stands disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J
PRAVESH KUMAR MISHRA /177