SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
FARJAND ALI
SHREYA PAREEK D/O SHRI VINOD PAREEK W/O SHRI SONU PAREEK, – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP/787/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 787/2022

1.

Shreya Pareek D/o Shri Vinod Pareek W/o Shri Sonu

Pareek, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Bamoritalli

Bandobasti,haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand, At Present

R/o Village Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar,

Rajasthan.

2.

Sonu Pareek S/o Madan Lal Pareek, Aged About 24 Years,

R/o Village Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar,

Rajasthan.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of

Home Affairs, And Justice, Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

Superintendent Of Police Station, Alwar

3.

Station House Officer, Police Station Bansur, District

Alwar.

4.

Shri Vinod Pareek S/o Shri Prakash Chand Pareek, R/o

Bamoritalli Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.

5.

Radha Pareek W/o Vinod Pareek, R/o Bamoritalli

Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.

6.

Jitendra Pareek S/o Shri Prakash Chand Pareek, R/o

Bamoritalli Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.

7.

Vimla Pareek W/o Jitendra Pareek, R/o Bamoritalli

Bandobasti, Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand.

8.

Mahinder Sharma S/o Jagn Nath Sharma, R/o Adarsh

Colony, Near Balaji Mandir, Rudrapur, Tehsilkichha, District

Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.

9.

Babita W/o Mahinder Sharma, R/o Adarsh Colony, Near

Balaji Mandir, Rudrapur, Tehsilkichha, District Udham

Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.

10.

Madan Lal Pareek S/o Shri Ganga Sahay Pareek, R/o

Village Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan

11.

Sumitra Devi W/o Madan Lal Pareek, R/o Village Khohari,

Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan

----Respondents

(2 of 3)

[CRLMP-787/2022]

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid, Adv., through

VC

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. F. R. Meena, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

24/01/2022

The petitioners have preferred this petition for issuance of

necessary directions to the official respondents to provide

adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground

that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of

private respondent Nos.4 to 11.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of

the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal

liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to

the same amounts to violation of the same.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as

perusing the record of the case, since the petitioners apprehend

threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court disposes of the

present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear

before the Superintendent of Police, Alwar along with appropriate

representation regarding their grievance. The Superintendent of

Police, Alwar shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners,

and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may

pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection

to the petitioners.

(3 of 3)

[CRLMP-787/2022]

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not

affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the

petitioners.

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(FARJAND ALI),J

PRAVESH KUMAR MISHRA /177

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top