SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAIDEEP SINGH RATHORE SON OF SHREE SHIVKUMAR SINGH RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 1378/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1378/2022

Jaideep Singh Rathore Son Of Shree Shivkumar Singh Rathore,

Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of A-16, Saraswati Marg,

Parivahan Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary,

Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Deputy Commissioner Zone-5, Jaipur Development

Authority, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3.

The Commissioner Nagar Nigam Grater Jaipur, Pandit

Dindayal Upadhyay Bhavan, Lalkothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur,

Rajasthan.

4.

Deputy Commissioner Planning Second, Nagar Nigam

Grater Jaipur, Rajasthan.

5.

District Collector, Jaipur District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

6.

Tahsildar, Jaipur, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

7.

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur.

8.

Deputy Commissioner (Vigilance), Nagar Nigam Grater

Jaipur, Pandit Dindayal Upadhyay Bhavan, Lalkothi, Tonk

Road, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Jaideep Singh Rathore in person

through VC

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Judgment

08/02/2022

In this public interest petition the petitioner has raised

objection to allotment of certain land in the vicinity of Jaipur City

(2 of 2)

[CW-1378/2022]

to private individuals which the petitioner contends being a

government land could not have been so allotted.

We are not inclined to entertain this public interest petition.

Firstly, the allottees are not joined as respondents. Secondly, the

order of allotment suggests that the same is done by collecting

certain amount of money. Small plots are thus allocated by

collecting charges for the same. The government is not prohibited

from allotting public land to private individuals unless, of course,

such allottment is by breaching any of the rules or is malafide to

favour private individuals.

Without sufficient material, this public interest petition has

been filed. In the event, the same is dismissed.

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

(AKIL KURESHI),CJ

BRIJ MOHAN GANDHI/36

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top