SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
MANNA @ MANJUR SON OF IDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 1416/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1416/2022

1.

Manna @ Manjur Son Of Idu, Aged About 28 Years,

Resident Of Village Khedali Kaji, Police Station Jurhara,

District Bharatpur (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail,

Deeg)

2.

Shahid Son Of Idu, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of

Village Khedali Kaji, Police Station Jurhara, District

Bharatpur (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg)

3.

Mubin Son Of Isha, Resident Of Village Khedali Kaji, Police

Station Jurhara, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ( Presently

Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg)

4.

Hanif Son Of Isha, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of

Village Khedali Kaji, Police Station Jurhara, District

Bharatpur (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg)

5.

Sakir Son Of Raseed, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of

Village Khedali Kaji, Police Station Jurhara, District

Bharatpur (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg)

6.

Samim Son Of Raseed, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of

Village Khedali Kaji, Police Station Jurhara, District

Bharatpur (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Ankit Khandelwal through VC

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

31/01/2022

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-1416/2022]

No.39/2021 registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Bharatpur

for the offence(s) under Sections 3,4, 8 of RBA Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They are

behind the bars since long and conclusion of trial may take long

time. Hence, the petitioners be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners

on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Manna

@ Manjur Son Of Idu; (2) Shahid Son Of Idu; (3) Mubin Son

Of Isha; (4) Hanif Son Of Isha; (5) Sakir Son Of Raseed and

(6) Samim Son Of Raseed shall be enlarged on bail provided

each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court

concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to

do so.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Brijesh 123.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top