HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
DHARMENDRA KUMAR KATARA, SON OF BANWARI LAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 2177/2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 2177/2019
1.
Dharmendra Kumar Katara, Son Of Banwari Lal Sharma,
Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Fulwari Gate, Bair
Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
2.
Priyanka Kumari Meena, D/o Kishan Singh Meena, Aged
About 24 Years, Resident Of Vllage Mokhselli, Tehsil Bair,
District Bharatpur.
3.
Smt. Seema Sharma, W/o Rajesh Kumar Katara, Aged
About 45 Years, Resident Of Near Fulwari Gate, Bair,
Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
4.
Radhey Shyam Son Of Kishan Lal, Aged About 44 Years,
Resident Of Village And Post Khedli Gadasiya, Tehsil
Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur.
5.
Smt. Khelwanti Bai Meena, W/o Sanjay Kumar Meena,
Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village And Post
Menapura, Tehsil Bhusawar, Distt. Bharatpur.
6.
Kapil Kumar Prajapati, S/o Radha Kishan, Aged About 30
Years, Resident Of Rageya Ragava Colony, Bair, Distt.
Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
7.
Sanju Kumari D/o Prem Singh, Aged About 18 Years,
Resident Of Gram Ghatoli, Tehsil Roopwas, Distt.
Bharatpur, (Rajasthan).
8.
Smt. Inderwati, W/o Bachoo Singh, Aged About 36 Years,
Resident Of Gram Ajadpura, Post Jeevad, Tehsil Bair,
Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
9.
Bachoo Singh S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 44 Years,
Resident Of Ajadpura, Post Jeewad, Tehsil Bair, Distt.
Bharatpur (Rajasthan).
10.
Jitendra Kumar Saini, S/o Badan Singh, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of Bhusawar Gatae, Bair Distt. Bharatpur,
(Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Law
Department, Government, Government Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2.
District Legal Service Authority, Through Its Secretary,
(2 of 2)
[CW-2177/2019]
Adr Centre, District And Session Court, Bharatpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
29/01/2019
1.
In view of the judgment passed by this Court, the writ
petition preferred by the Para Legal Volunteers would not lie as no
right to the post is available to a volunteer who himself opts for
performing the service known as Para Legal Service. No civil
rights or legal rights can be said to have been taken away if a
person is not included in the Para Legal Volunteers Panel.
2.
Accordingly the writ petition is held to be not
maintainable.
3.
The claim for salary for the work done or any grievance
which an existing volunteer or a volunteer who is no more on the
panel, may have against the selection process or pending salary
then he would always be free to take up his grievances before the
Chairman, Legal Services Authority or person so delegated by
him.
4.
Granting the said liberty, the writ petition is dismissed
as not maintainable.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
N.Gandhi/98
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.