SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
DHARMENDRA KUMAR KATARA, SON OF BANWARI LAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 2177/2019



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writs No. 2177/2019

1.

Dharmendra Kumar Katara, Son Of Banwari Lal Sharma,

Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Fulwari Gate, Bair

Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

2.

Priyanka Kumari Meena, D/o Kishan Singh Meena, Aged

About 24 Years, Resident Of Vllage Mokhselli, Tehsil Bair,

District Bharatpur.

3.

Smt. Seema Sharma, W/o Rajesh Kumar Katara, Aged

About 45 Years, Resident Of Near Fulwari Gate, Bair,

Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

4.

Radhey Shyam Son Of Kishan Lal, Aged About 44 Years,

Resident Of Village And Post Khedli Gadasiya, Tehsil

Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur.

5.

Smt. Khelwanti Bai Meena, W/o Sanjay Kumar Meena,

Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village And Post

Menapura, Tehsil Bhusawar, Distt. Bharatpur.

6.

Kapil Kumar Prajapati, S/o Radha Kishan, Aged About 30

Years, Resident Of Rageya Ragava Colony, Bair, Distt.

Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

7.

Sanju Kumari D/o Prem Singh, Aged About 18 Years,

Resident Of Gram Ghatoli, Tehsil Roopwas, Distt.

Bharatpur, (Rajasthan).

8.

Smt. Inderwati, W/o Bachoo Singh, Aged About 36 Years,

Resident Of Gram Ajadpura, Post Jeevad, Tehsil Bair,

Distt. Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

9.

Bachoo Singh S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 44 Years,

Resident Of Ajadpura, Post Jeewad, Tehsil Bair, Distt.

Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

10.

Jitendra Kumar Saini, S/o Badan Singh, Aged About 24

Years, Resident Of Bhusawar Gatae, Bair Distt. Bharatpur,

(Rajasthan).

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Law

Department, Government, Government Secretariat,

Jaipur.

2.

District Legal Service Authority, Through Its Secretary,

(2 of 2)

[CW-2177/2019]

Adr Centre, District And Session Court, Bharatpur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Order

29/01/2019

1.

In view of the judgment passed by this Court, the writ

petition preferred by the Para Legal Volunteers would not lie as no

right to the post is available to a volunteer who himself opts for

performing the service known as Para Legal Service. No civil

rights or legal rights can be said to have been taken away if a

person is not included in the Para Legal Volunteers Panel.

2.

Accordingly the writ petition is held to be not

maintainable.

3.

The claim for salary for the work done or any grievance

which an existing volunteer or a volunteer who is no more on the

panel, may have against the selection process or pending salary

then he would always be free to take up his grievances before the

Chairman, Legal Services Authority or person so delegated by

him.

4.

Granting the said liberty, the writ petition is dismissed

as not maintainable.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

N.Gandhi/98

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top