SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SMT. SAROJ RAJPUROHIT W/O SHRI SURENDRA RAJPUROHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['PRATEEK SHARMA', 'P P', '', 'D K DIXIT']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2683/2021

Smt. Saroj Rajpurohit W/o Shri Surendra Rajpurohit, R/o 203

Neelkanth Heights Hawa Sadak Jaipur

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Prateek Sharma, Adv. through VC

For Respondent(s)

For Complainant(s)

:

:

Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

Mr. D. K. Dixit, Adv. through VC

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

13/05/2021

1.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438

Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.23/2020 registered at Police

Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under

Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

had joined the investigation as per the direction of this court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is admitted

position that the petitioner’s husband and complainant were

business partner. As per business transaction, complainant had

given money to her husband and case pertains to civil nature and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top