HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1323/2014

Laxman Ram, son of Shri Ballaram Ji, Resident of Village Sarang

Ka Bas, Tehsil and District Jaipur. At present B-175, Sanjay

Nagar-B, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. Laduram Son of Shri Vena,

2. Kalyan Son of Shri Vena,

3. Prabhu Son of Shri Chhitar,

4. Gopi Son of Shri Chhitar,

5. Babu Lal son of Shri Chhitar,

All residents of Village Sarang, Tehsil and District Jaipur.

6. State of Rajasthan through Land Holder Tehsildar, Tehsil

District and Jaipur (Rajasthan).

7. Deputy Registrar, Jaipur District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

----Defendant-Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr.Amit Jindal, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR

Order

18/07/2022

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This Court asked learned counsel for the petitioner

Mr.Amit Jindal as what has been been challenged by the petitioner

in the present writ petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted

that the present writ petition was filed by the petitioner

challenging the order dated 16.12.2013, whereby, application

under Section 73 of the Evidence Act was allowed by the

(2 of 2)

[CW-1323/2014]

Additional District Judge No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur and as

such, the documents were sent to the FSL for its report.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

during pendency of the misc. restoration application, the suit filed

by the petitioner-plainitff has been decided and as such, the writ

petition has become infructuous.

This Court, in view of subsequent developments taken

place, dismisses the writ petition as having become infructuous.

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR), J

Himanshu Soni/C-1