HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
CHHOTU S/O SHRI RAMCHANDRA JI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/2332/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2332/2022
Chhotu S/o Shri Ramchandra Ji, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Jagpura Ps Ananatpura Kota Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Shobha Sharma, Adv. for
Mr. Satish Chandra Pachori, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
02/05/2022
The present bail application has been filed under Section 438
Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.444/2021 registered at Police
Station Anantpura, District Kota for the offence(s) under Sections
143, 332, 353 of IPC and Section 3 PDPP Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has
been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner was not present at
the time of incident. Nothing is to be recovered from the
petitioner. So, the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments
advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted
name of the petitioner is mentioned in the FIR. He further submits
that petitioner and other persons had attacked the complainant
and other persons with lethal weapons while they were on duty.
So, the anticipatory bail be dismissed.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-2332/2022]
I have considered the arguments advanced by learned
counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
Allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner and other
persons armed with lethal weapons and restrained the
complainant and other persons from performing their duties and
they have also attacked on them. So, looking to the gravity of
offence, I do not consider it a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on
anticipatory bail.
Hence, the anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Aks/-66