Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1038/2019 Smt Arpita W/o Shri Gulesh Meena, D/o Shri Hanuman Meena B/c Meena, Aged About 18 Years, R/o 276, Samidhi, Nainwa, District Bundi, Raj.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi, Rajasthan.
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Sawaimadhopur, Raj. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur, Raj.
5. Gulshan Meena S/o Shri Dhanpal, B/c Meena, R/o Borda, Police Station Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur, Raj. (Husband Of Petitioner).
6. Shri Dhanpal S/o Shri Baluram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Meena, R/o Borda, Police Station Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur, Raj. (Father In Law Of Petitioner).
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Petitioner present in person.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Order
13/02/2019 Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
praying that respondents No.1 to 4 be directed to protect life and liberty of the petitioner as she apprehend danger to her life at the hands of respondents No.5 and 6.
This court in pre-lunch session had directed the Registrar (Judicial) of this court to record statement of petitioner upon her due identification. In pursuance of said order, Registrar (Judicial) has recorded statement of petitioner. The said statement is taken on record.
For ready reference, statement of petitioner Smt. Arpita is reproduced below:-
“jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ihB] t;iqj ,l0ch0 fØfeuy fel0 ihfV'ku uEcj 1038@2019 Jhefr vfiZrk cuke jktLFkku ljdkj o vU;
fnukad 13@02@2019 eSa vfiZrk ifRu Jh xqyds'k ehuk iq=h Jh guqeku ehuk]
tkfr ehuk] vk;q yxHkx 19 o"kZ] fuoklh& xkao lesnh] uSuok] ftyk&
cwanhA 'kiFk iwoZd c;ku djrh gw¡ fd ejs h 'kknh xqyds'k ehuk ds lkFk fnukad 30-04-2018 dks gq;h FkhA ejs k ifr xqyds'k ehuk ejs s lkFk ekjihV djrk FkkA eSa vjfoUn ehuk dks fiNys ,d lky ls tkurh gWwA vjfoUn ehuk xehjk xkao dk jgus okyk gSA ejs s ifr dh ekjihV ls eSa ijs'kku Fkh blfy, eSa vjfoUn ehuk ds ikl fnukad 01- 01-2019 dks vk x;h vkSj rc ls eSa mlh ds ikl jg jgh gWwA eSa vjfoUn ehuk ds ikl viuh ethZ ls ,oa fcuk fdlh ncko ds vk;h gWwA xqyds'k ehuk ds firk /kuiky us vjfoUn ehuk ds f[kykQ esjs vigj.k ,oa tsojr vkSj uxnh ys tkus dh tks fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h gS oks >wBh ,oa xyr gSA eSa vius llqjky ,oa vius ekrk&firk ds ikl ugha tkuk pkgrh gWw vkSj vjfoUn ehuk ds lkFk gh jguk pkgrh gWwA eq>s vkSj dqN ugha dguk gSA uksV %& xokg dk c;ku esjs funsZ'ku esa mlds dgs vuqlkj Vad.kdrkZ }kjk dEI;qVj ij Vafdr fd;k x;k] ftls xokg dks i<+dj lquk;k o le>k;k x;k rks mlus mDr dFkuksa dks lqu o le> dj lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;kA ¼jftLVªkj U;kf;d½ After going through the contents of the statement made by the petitioner, a direction is issued to the concerned SHO to ensure necessary vigil that no physical harm is caused to the life of the petitioner.
In view of above, present petition is disposed of.
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J
