HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SHRAVANRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJ AND ANR – Respondent
CRLMP 66/2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 66 / 2018
Shravanram S/o Shri Tilokaram B/c Jat, R/o Ward No.6, Baldu,
Nimbhijodhan, District Nagur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through PP.
2. Department of Mines and Geology, Rajasthan, Ajmer, Through
Mining Engineer, Ajmer
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aladeen Khan, PP
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Order
24/01/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that in
FIR No.170/2017 registered at PS Rupangarh, Ajmer for the
offence under Section 379 IPC & under Section 4/21 of the Mines
& Mineral (Development & Regulations) Act,1957 (‘MMDR Act’),
the matter has been compounded in regard to the vehicle seized
and a compounding fees of Rs.1,08,750/- has been deposited on
07.12.2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite this,
learned court below has rejected the application for releasing the
Vehicle (Dumper) No.RJ-37-GA-4203 in favour of the accused-
petitioner.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-66/2018]
On perusal of the order dated 11.12.2017, it is found that
the court below has inferred that simply by depositing the
compound fees, it cannot be presumed that the offence under
Section 4/21 of the MMDR Act has been compounded. This
inference drawn by the court is completely fallacious and cannot
be sustained. As per sub-section (2) of Section 23-A of the MMDR
Act, no further proceeding shall be taken against the offender
after compounding of offence. In view of this, the seized vehicle
ought to have been released by the court below. In view of above,
the misc. petition is allowed. The order dated 20.12.2017 passed
by learned Addl. District Judge, Kishangarh, Ajmer is quashed and
set-aside. It is directed that Dumper bearing Registration No.RJ-
37-GA-4203 shall be delivered to the petitioner on ‘supurdgi’ on
his furnishing ‘Supurdginama’ in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with
two sureties in the like amount, with the undertaking to produce
the vehicle in question before the concerned court as and when
required and shall keep the condition of the vehicle intact and
shall not transfer, mortgage or otherwise alienate the vehicle or
damage it and change its shape in any manner whatsoever. The
petitioner shall also furnish photographs of the vehicle showing its
number, colour etc. It is made clear that in future if the vehicle is
found to have been used in similar offence, the same would be
liable to be confiscated.
(DEEPAK MAHESHWARI) J.
Arun/55
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.