HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 242/2021

In

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1433/2021

1.

Omprakash S/o Shri Shivcharan, Aged About 50 Years,

R/o Village Nagla Bamuri, Tehsil Bayana, District

Bharatpur (Raj.) At Present Working As Chowkidar,

Government Ambedkar Hostel, Rudawal, Tehsil Roopbas,

District Bharatpur (Raj.)

2.

Kishan Singh S/o Shri Jhamman Singh, Aged About 55

Years, R/o Manjhi, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

At Present Working As Chowkidar, Government Ambedkar

Hostel, Nadbai District Bharatpur (Raj.)

----Appellants

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social

Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of

Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2.

The Director-Cum-Joint Special Secretary, Social Justice

And Empowerment Department, 22, Raj Bhawan Road,

Ambedkar Nagar, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.)

3.

The Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment

Department, Bharatpur (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Azad Ahmed, Advocate

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS

Order

09/03/2021

Appellants have filed the appeal challenging the order

dated 15.02.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby,

(2 of 2)

[SAW-242/2021]

application moved by the appellants for interim relief, was

declined.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and

have gone through the record available on the file carefully.

Appellants have filed the writ petition challenging the

order dated 25.01.2021, whereby, promotions were ordered from

Class-IV post to the post of Lower Division Clerk. It is the case of

the appellants that they were also liable to be considered for

promotion, whereas, junior to the appellants had been considered

and promoted vide the impugned order.

Learned Single Judge vide order dated 15.02.2021 has

declined to grant interim relief sought by the appellants. By way of

interim relief, appellants had sought that the operation and effect

of the impugned order dated 25.01.2021 be stayed. Vide the

impugned order, 41 persons have been ordered to be promoted.

The impugned order would be subject to the outcome of the writ

petition filed by the appellants. However, at this stage, there is no

occasion to stay the operation of the impugned order and to stop

the entire promotion process.

Dismissed.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J

(SABINA),J

Aks/Hemant-27