SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
AASHISH BINDAL S/O SHRI DAMODAR BINDAL – Appellant
Versus
MINAKSHI BINDAL W/O AASHISH BINDAL – Respondent
CRLMP 2102/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2102/2022

Aashish Bindal S/o Shri Damodar Bindal, Aged About

40 Years, Resident Of House No. 44, Ward No. 24,

Dilshuk Ki Tal, Hindon City, Tehsil Hindaun, District

Karauli, Rajasthan. ( Police Station Hindaun City,

District Karauli).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Minakshi Bindal W/o Aashish Bindal, Aged About

36 Years, Resident Of House No. 44, Ward No.

24, Dilshuk Ki Tal, Hindon City, Tehsil Hindaun,

District Karouli, Rajasthan. ( Police Station

Hindaun City, District Karouli).

2.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public

Prosecutor.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Brijesh Bhardwaj

For

Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Order

01/12/2022

;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk

ds rgr ;g ;kfpdk ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls iqfyl

Fkkuk&fg.MkSu ftyk&djkSyh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k

531@2021 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 406] 323] 504 Hkk-na-la-

(2 of 4)

[CRLMP-2102/2022]

rFkk 4@5 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh

izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k dh gSA

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd ;kph@vfHk;qDr

rFkk ifjokfn;k dk fookg fnukad 20-04-2006 dks gqvk Fkk]

oLrqr% ifjoknh i{k dh vksj ls dh x;h ekjihV o pksjh vkfn

ds laca/k esa ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVz la[;k 518@21 iqfyl Fkkuk

fg.MkSu esa vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls fnukad 11-11-2021 dks ntZ

djk;h Fkh ftlds dkj.k cnyk ysus dh uh;r ls feF;k vk/kkjksa

ij orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h x;h gS tks dkuwuh

izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gS] var esa ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr

fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ

esa of.kZr vk{ksiksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo Li"V :i

ls izdV gks jgs gSa rFkk lkjoku vuqla/kku gksuk 'ks"k gSA ;g

vkjksi feF;k gksa] ,slk bl izdze ij fu"d"kZ ugha fudkyk tk

ldrkA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls

tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] og vuqla/kku vFkok fopkj.k dk fo"k;

gks ldrk gS] vUr esa ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu

fd;kA

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu

fd;kA

of.kZr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ifjoknh }kjk vfHk;qDr ds

fo:) ngst dh ekax dks ysdj izrkfMr fd;s tkus o dwzjrkiw.kZ

O;ogkj fd;s tkus o L=h/ku ugha ykSVk;s tkus ds laca/k esa

vkjksi yxk;k gS tks laKs; vijk/k ls lacaf/kr gSA ;fn izFke

lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vk{ksiksa ls dksbZ laKs; vijk/k ds rRo

(3 of 4)

[CRLMP-2102/2022]

izdV ugha gks jgs gksa vFkok mu vkjksiksa dks lgh eku fy;s tkus

ds ckotwn U;kf;d izfdz;k ds nq:i;ksx dk ekeyk izdV gksrk

gS rks ,slh vFkok vU; leku vkSj viokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa gh

izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr

iznRr vUrfufgZr 'kfDr;ksa dks iz;ksx djrs gq, fujLr fd;k tk

ldrk gS] fdUrq ,slh ifjfLFkfr;ka orZeku ekeys esa ekStwn ugha

gSaA vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls bl izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr

vkjksiksa dks ftu vk/kkjksa ij feF;k crkus dk iz;kl fd;k gS] os

vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu lafLFkr gksus ij cpko dk fo"k; gks

ldrs gSaA

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2022 SCC OnLine SC

820 State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil Sharda and

Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.

ds iSjk la[;k*07 esa ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%&

"7.Having gone through the impugned

judgment and order passed by the High Court

by which the High Court has set aside the

criminal proceedings in exercise of powers

under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the

High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial,

which as such is not permissible at this stage

and while deciding the application under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by

this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial

can be conducted by the High Court in exercise

of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction

and at the stage of deciding the application

under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court

(4 of 4)

[CRLMP-2102/2022]

cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the

particular case b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top