SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
SONU @ SUNIL REGAR S/O SHRI BADRINARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['ATAR SINGH', '', 'BHUWNESH SHARMA', 'PP']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3073/2022

Sonu @ Sunil Regar S/o Shri Badrinarayan, Aged About 29

Years, R/o Plat No. 38 Suraj Nagar Vijayapura Ps Kanota Distt.

Jaipur Raj. (Accused In J.c. At Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Atar Singh

Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. M.S. Saini, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

29/03/2022

1.

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner Sonu @ Sunil Regar S/o

Shri Badrinarayan. The petitioner has been arrested in connection

with FIR No.749/2021 registered at Police Station Kanota, District

Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 302 of IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case

has been foisted against the petitioner. He has nothing to do with

the alleged offence and no useful purpose would be served by

keeping him behind the bars.

3.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail

application.

4.

Heard learned counsel for both the sides. Perused the challa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top