HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
ROSHNI URF SUNITA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJ AND ORS – Respondent
CW 1712/2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
JAIPUR
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1712 / 2017
Roshni @ Sunita D/o. Shri Kamraj, by Caste Christian, Aged About
42 Years, Rawat Bhata Road, Opposite Office of Tilam Sangh, Near
Hanuman Mandir, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Urban
Development Housing, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Chairman, Urban Improvement Trust (UIT), Kota (Raj.)
3. Secretary, Urban Improvement Trust (UIT), Kota (Raj.)
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Shri Govind Choudhary
For Respondent(s) :
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Order
08/02/2017
Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that
petitioner is having her house on the disputed land, situated at
Tilam Sangh, Near Hanuman Mandir, Kota for the last 30 years.
She has the entire documents such as voter I.D., aadhar card,
bank passbook, gas connection etc. on the above house address.
However, the UIT and its officials are regularly interfering with the
possession of the petitioner inasmuch they have demolished the
boundary wall of her house. Petitioner apprehends that her house
may be demolished. Petitioner is a very poor lady. She therefore
requested way back on 19.8.1995 to UIT to consider her case
sympathetically and if at all she is required to be shifted, she
should be rehabilitated on any other land. The employees of the
(2 of 2)
[CW-1712/2017]
UIT recently visited the house of the petitioner and threatened her
to vacate the house or else, she may be possibly evicted. The
employees of the UIT are continuously torturing the petitioner.
Petitioner served a legal notice on respondents on 21.4.2014 that
without acquiring her land, the respondents cannot dispossess her.
However, when the notice was served on the respondents, they
after receiving the aforesaid notice, demolished the part of the
house of the petitioner.
Having regard to the facts aforesaid, instead of directly
entertaining the writ petition, petitioner is required to approach
Secretary, UIT, Kota with all the documents showing that she has
been having possession over the land in dispute for last more than
30 years, who shall take a final decision on the representation of
the petitioner for either acquiring the land and rehabilitation of
petitioner or otherwise by a reasoned speaking order within two
months from the date of production of copy of this order.
The writ petition is disposed off.
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J.
RS/42
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.