HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
RAM SWAROOP S/O KESRILAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR.S – Appellant
Versus
MEHMOOD ALAM HASHMI S/O HAZI MOHAMMED IDRIS HASMI – Respondent
CSA 50/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 50/2021
Ram Swaroop S/o Kesrilal (Since Deceased) Through LRs.
1. Surendra Kumar S/o Ramswaroop
2. Padam Kumar S/o Ramswaroop
3. Sheela D/o Ramswaroop
4. Hemlata D/o Ramswaroop
5. Nathibai D/o Late Shri Ramswaroop
Resident of Infront Of Range Office, Chhabra, District Baran.
(Rajasthan.)
----Appellant-Defendants
Versus
Mehmood Alam Hashmi S/o Hazi Mohammed Idris Hasmi, R/o
Station Road, Chhabra, Tehsil Chhabra, District Baran (Raj.) At
Present Bhopal (M.P.)
----Respondent-Plaintiff
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Kumar Singhal, Advocate
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Kaleem Ahamed Khan, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA
Order
17/08/2021
The instant Civil Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC
has been filed by the defendants-appellants (for short 'the
defendants') aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated
19.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional District Judge,
Chhabra, District Baran whereby the said court dismissed the
appeal filed by the defendants and upheld the judgment and
decree dated 18.12.2015 passed by the learned Senior Civil
Judge, Chhabra, District Baran in Civil Suit No.42/2010.
Learned counsel for the defendants Mr. Naresh Kumar
Singhal after arguing the matter at some length, on instruction of
(2 of 3)
[CSA-50/2021]
his clients, has not pressed this appeal on merits. The only prayer
made by him is that time of one and a half year may kindly be
granted to the defendants to vacate the tenanted premises (for
short ‘the premises’).
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-plaintiff
(for short ‘the plaintiff’) Mr. Kaleem Ahamed Khan on instructions
of his client has no objection in granting the time as prayed for by
the learned counsel for the defendants for vacating the premises.
In view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel
for the parties, this second appeal is being decided in the following
terms:-
1.
The defendants shall be entitled to continue in
possession of the premises uptill 28.02.2023 but not
beyond that, subject to condition that they will hand over
the vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to
the plaintiff on or before 28.02.2023.
2.
The defendants shall deposit arrears of mesne profit, if
any, due towards them up to 31.07.2021 at the rate of
Rs.800/- per month within a period of one month from
today with the Bank account of the plaintiff and
thereafter, from the month of August, 2021, the
defendants shall continue to deposit the mesne profit @
Rs.2000/- per month with the bank account of the
plaintiff by 15th of each month.
3.
The defendants shall not alienate or otherwise create
third party right or hand over possession of the premises
in question to any other person.
4.
If the defendants fail to deposit the mesne profit
consecutively for four months, the plaintiff shall be at
liberty to execute the decree without any further
reference to the Court.
(3 of 3)
[CSA-50/2021]
Further, the defendants shall submit an undertaking on
oath incorporating the aforesaid conditions before the Senior Civil
Judge Chhabra, District Baran within a period of four weeks from
the date of this order. In case, the defendants fail to submit the
undertaking as aforesaid within four weeks from today and/or
commits breach of any of the conditions of this order, the plaintiff
shall be entitled to execute the decree forthwith and obtain
possession of the premises in accordance with law and it will be
open for the plaintiff to initiate contempt proceedings in the Court.
The second appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
Consequently, upon disposal of the second appeal, stay
application, filed therewith, does not survive and same also stands
diposed of.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
Mohit-6