HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
JAHEER AHAMAD SON OF SHRI FATEH MOHAMMED – Respondent
SAW 265/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 265/2021
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14992/2020
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director General Of
Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
----Appellants-Respondents
Versus
Jaheer Ahamad Son Of Shri Fateh Mohammed, Aged About 29
Years, Resident Of Village Post Jajaud, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Sikar.
----Respondent-Writ Petitioner
Connected With
D.B. Civil Misc. Application No. 1/2021
In
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 253/2021
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14992/2020
1.
Pushpendra Tiwari, S/o Girraj Tiwari, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Pradhano Ka Mohalla, Phagi, Jaipur.
2.
Jitendra Kuri, S/o Kanaram Kuri, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Dhani Kuriyo Ki, VPO Pachlangi, Tehsil Udaipurwati,
Jhunjhunu.
3.
Rohitash Nitharwal, S/o Madanlal Nitharwal, Aged About
23 Years, R/o Village Gidawala, Post Office Simarla, Tehsil
Shri Madhopur, Sikar.
4.
Deepesh Verma, S/o Ramavtar Verma, Aged About 24
Years, R/o B-101, Bank Colony, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur.
5.
Satish Kumar Meena, S/o Pooran Singh, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Village Bahrare Khparel, PO Andhiyari, Tehsil
Roopwas, District Bharatpur.
6.
Parmeshwar Lal Bhamoo, S/o Purn Singh Bhamoo, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Bhairupura, Tehsil Dhod, Sikar.
7.
Ashish Dhabas, S/o Chhitar Mal Dhabas, Aged About 21
Years, R/o Village Thikariya, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Sikar.
(2 of 10)
[SAW-265/2021]
8.
Brajmohan Sharma, S/o Ramavtar Sharma, Aged About
23 Years, R/o Vpo Thenpura, Tehsil Malpura, Tonk.
9.
Ghanshyam Jhakar, S/o Vijaylal Jat, Aged About 22 Years,
R/o Ramdh, PO Dangarthal, Tehsil Newai.
10.
Deshraj Tetarwal, S/o Maliram Tetarwal, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Dhani Nayanagar, (Nawodi)PO-Govindpura,
Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Sikar.
----Appellants-Applicants
Versus
1.
Jaheer Ahamad, S/o Fateh Mohammad, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Gram Post Jajod, Tehsil Lakshmangarh, Sikar.
2.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police,
Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.
Inspector General (Recruitment), Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
For Applicant(s)
:
:
Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Advocate General
with Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma,
Advocate through video conferencing
Mr. Ashish Davessar, Advocate with
Mr. Parmeshwar Lal Pilania, Advocate
through video conferencing
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Ajaj Nabee, Advocate through
video conferencing
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
24/05/2021
Appellant-State has filed the appeal challenging the
order dated 24.02.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge,
whereby, writ petition filed by the respondent Jaheer Ahamad, was
allowed.
Some of the affected candidates have also filed
application for grant of leave to file an appeal against the order
dated 24.02.2021.
(3 of 10)
[SAW-265/2021]
Both the cases are taken up together for discussion as
challenge in both the cases is the order dated 24.02.2021 passed
by the learned Single Judge.
Respondent- writ petitioner had applied for the post of
Constable (Driver) in pursuance to the advertisement dated
04.12.2019 issued by the Director General of Police, Rajasthan,
Jaipur inviting applications for the post of Constable and Constable
(Driver). Respondent- writ petitioner by filing the writ petition
urged that the State be directed to strictly follow the procedure
laid down under the standing orders and Rajasthan Police
Subordinate Service Rules, 1989. It was the case of the
respondent- writ petitioner that the procedure followed by the
State for making the recruitment was contrary to the standing
orders and the rules. Written examination had been conducted
jointly all over the State and the merit list of written examination
was common, but thereafter State had prepared separate cut-off
for each district and after