SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR – Respondent
CRLMP 878/2018



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 878/2018

1.

Deepak Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Hemraj Sharma, R/o

Rasala Mohalla, Village And Post Kathumar, Tehsil

Kathumar, District Alwar Raj.

2.

Mahender Kashmiri S/o Tirathram, R/o Kathumar, Tehsil

Kathumar, District Alwar Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.

2.

Dharmendra Kumar S/o Shri Tara Singh Takan, Presently

Posted Rto, Kota, R/o Village Ardawata, Police Station

Chidawa, District Jhunjhunu Raj

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. on behalf

of Mr. Arvind Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

Mr. N. N. Sharma, Adv. on behalf of

Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

16/08/2022

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the

petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR

No.489/2014 dated 20.10.2014 registered at Police Station Sewar,

District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 417, 419, 468,

469 of IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto.

Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned

counsel for the respondent submitted that compromise has been

arrived between the parties and they have settled their dispute.

So, criminal proceedings pending between them, be set aside.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-878/2018]

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments

advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledging the

factum of compromise between the parties and submitted that he

has no objection if the FIR in question and consequential criminal

proceeding are quashed.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the

record.

A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute

between the parties has amicably been settled by them. In view of

compromise and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court of

India in cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10

SCC 303, Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC

466 and Manoj Agarwal & Anr. Vs. The State of Uttar

Pradesh & Anr. decided on 04.03.2022 by the Hon’ble Supreme

Court, this Court deems it just and proper to quash the FIR in

question and consequential criminal proceeding.

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.

The FIR No.489/2014 dated 20.10.2014 registered at Police

Station Sewar, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections

417, 419, 468, 469 of IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto are

hereby quashed and set aside.

All the pending applications also stand disposed of.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Jatin /21

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top