SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
PRAKASH CHAND PAHADIYA – Appellant
Versus
ARBITRATOR AND SPECIAL AUDITOR ORS – Respondent
CW 990/2015



Advocates:
['SURESH CHARAN', 'SANDEEP MATHUR', '', 'RAJESH MOOTHA']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4130/2015

Anil Jain (President Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti

Ltd. Ajmer) S/o Shri Parasmal Ji Choudhary, R/o 13/325,

Choudhary Bhawan, Bisayati Gali, Naya Bazar, Ajmer

(Rajasthan).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Arbitrator And Special Auditor Sahakari Samitiya, Ajmer.

2.

Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer

Through Secretary, Ajmer (Rajasthan).

3.

Shri Kishore Jalutharia, Election Officer, Chhota Bagru

Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer Through

Rajasthan Rajya Sahakari Election (Authority) Jaipur.

4.

Mansingh Rathore S/o Shri Radheyshyam, resident of

Christenganj, Indra Colony, Ajmer.

5.

Smt. Anju Mehta W/o Shri Jaswant Mehta, resident of

1955/1, Kabir Kutir, Rembal Road, Lohagarh Road, Ajmer.

6.

Dr. Sanjay Bansal, resident of 10/8, Bhagat Singh Kothi,

Opp. Session Court, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.

7.

Satyanarayan Agarwal S/o Late Shri Noratmal Agarwal,

resident of Modi Gali, Patti Katla, Ajmer.

8.

Suman Vijay W/o Shri Hanuman Lal Vijay, resident of

Sundar Vilas, Ajmer.

9.

Shri Trilok Chand Bansal, Ex. Minister, Chhota Bagru Grah

Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer, Resident Of Krishan

Kunj, Shyam Gali, Hathi Bhata, Ajmer.

10.

Bhanwarlal Choudhary, Treasure, Chhota Bagru Grah

Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

11.

Prakash Chand Pahadiya, Manager, Chhota Bagru Grah

Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

12.

Vijayraj, Dy. President, Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman

Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

13.

Chandra Kumar Jain, Manager, Chhota Bagru Grah

Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

14.

Purushotam Singh Manager, Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman

Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

(2 of 4)

[CW-4130/2015]

15.

Sharad Sharma, Manager, Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman

Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

16.

Ram Singh Nadela, Manager, Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman

Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer.

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 990/2015

Prakash Chand Pahadiya S/o Shri Mangi Lal Pahadiya, aged

about 64 years, R/o Choudhary Villa, House No.5, Sundar Vilas,

Ajmer At Present Director Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman Sahakari

Samiti Limited, Ajmer.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. Arbitrator And Special Auditor Cooperative Societies, Ajmer.

2. Chhota Bagru Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Ajmer

13/325, Choudhary Bhawan, Bisayati Gali, Naya Bazar, Ajmer

Through its Chairman.

3. Shri Mansingh Rathore S/o Shri Radheyshyam, resident of

Christenganj, Indra Colony, Ajmer.

4. Smt. Anju Mehta W/o Shri Jaswant Mehta, resident of 1955/1,

Kabir Kutir, Remble Road, Lohagarh Road, Ajmer.

5. Dr. Sanjay Bansal, resident of 10/8, Bhagat Singh Kothi, Opp.

Session Court, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.

6. Satyanarayan Agarwal S/o Late Shri Noratmal Agarwal,

resident of Modi Gali, Patti Katla, Ajmer.

7. Smt. Suman Vijay W/o Shri Hanuman Lal Vijay, resident of

Sundar Vilas, Ajmer.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rajesh Mootha, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sandeep Mathur, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR

Order

26/04/2022

(3 of 4)

[CW-4130/2015]

Matters come up on the applications No.1/2022 filed by the

respondent-Smt. Anju Mehta for dismissing the present writ

petitions as having become infructuous.

Learned counsel for the respondent-Mr. Sandeep Mathur

submitted that in the present writ petitions, petitioners have

challenged the orders dated 25.03.2013 and 16.01.2015 passed

by Arbitrator and Rajasthan State Cooperative Tribunal, Jaipur,

respectively.

Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the term

of the elected body has already expired in the year 2017 and

there was no interim order passed by this Court.

Learned counsel for the respondent further submitted that

the relief which is claimed in the present writ petition cannot be

granted in view of the lapse of time as term of the elected body of

5 years has come to an end.

Learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top