SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SHESHNA PARDI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP – Respondent
CRLMB 2026/2018



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 2026/2018

1.

Sheshna Pardi S/o Bapji, R/o Village Sewada, Police

Station Subhaspur District Shivpuri M.p. (At Present

Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)

2.

Nasir S/o Salim B/c Musalman, R/o Village Sewada, Police

Station Subhaspur District Shivpuri M.p. (At Present

Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)

3.

Manaw Pardi @ Inder Pardi S/o Kardhani Pardi, R/o

Village Sewada, Police Station Subhaspur District Shivpuri

M.p. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. R. R. Singh Rathore PP.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

11/04/2018

1.

Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section

439 Cr.P.C.

2.

F.I.R. No 376/2017 was registered at Police Station Bajaj

Nagar, Jaipur Metropolitan for offence under Sections 457, 380

I.P.C.

3.

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that there is no

recovery from the petitioners. Charge-sheet has been filed.

Petitioners were made accused in different cases. After arrest in

one case, trial would consume time.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-2026/2018]

4.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5.

I have considered the contentions.

6.

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

petitioners, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7.

This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed

that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided they

furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees twenty five thousand) each to the satisfaction of the trial

Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court

and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all

subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

so.

8.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioners repeat the

offence, State would be free to move cancellation of bail

application before the concerned Court.

9.

A Copy of this order be sent to concerned SHO for recording

the condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that in the event

of petitioners' repeating offence, SHO can move the Court for

cancellation of bail.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

Seema/11

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top