HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
VIRENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 6566/2010
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6566/2010
Virendra Singh Vs. State
Date of order : 23/7/2010.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Shri V.S. Chauhan for the petitioner.
Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State.
******
Heard learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for
the State and perused the relevant documents
placed before me.
Contention of the learned counsel
for the petitioner is that petitioner was
initially arrested in the present case on
2.7.2010 and thereafter his arrest was made
in other three cases. In total, there were
nine gas cylinders, which were allegedly
stolen. Petitioner as well as one Rajesh has
been made accused in this case. While Rajesh
has been enlarged on bail in all the cases
including the present case by order of the
Additional Sessions Judge dated 9.7.2010,
petitioner is still in jail. He is a student
of XII standard and would undertake not to
indulge in any offence in future. He
therefore should be given an opportunity to
reform himself.
Learned Public Prosecutor has
opposed the bail application.
Without expressing any opinion on
the merits of this case but taking into
2
consideration
all
the
facts
and
circumstances of the case, I deem it
appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on
bail.
In the result, this bail application
u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is
directed that petitioner Virendra Singh S/o
Jagdish Singh shall be released on bail in
F.I.R. No.415/2010, P.S. Vaishali Nagar,
Jaipur for offence u/s.380 of IPC on his
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in
the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the trial Court for his
appearance before that court on all dates of
hearing and as and when called upon to do so
till conclusion of the trial.
However, in case the petitioner is
again found indulging in similar or any
other offence at any point of time in
future, the bail granted to him by this
court, would be liable to be cancelled at
the instance of the prosecution on this
ground alone and stipulation to this effect
shall be inserted in the bail bonds produced
by the petitioner and the sureties to be
produced in support thereof shall be
verified by the Tehsildar of the area
concerned.
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J.
RS/